Quizzes & Puzzles6 mins ago
Further Proof If It Were Needed That The Left Are The Masters Of Nasty
12 Answers
Answers
1 to 12 of 12
where this scumbag is concerned no proof was needed...see my earlier post on him... a horrible nasty little piece of work...all thanks to Cor blimey we now have to hear him more puyblicly and he has a platform...
15:20 Fri 09th Oct 2015
Sadly, this isn't proof that just what you call 'the left' are 'masters of nasty', it's politicians, pure and simple.
No matter what side of the divide they sit, if the opportunity to score points over the other side presents itself, most of them will seize it and use it. Not all, I'll accept - there are some with an ounce of decency - but the vast majority of the career politicians we allow to run our lives these days would.
No matter what side of the divide they sit, if the opportunity to score points over the other side presents itself, most of them will seize it and use it. Not all, I'll accept - there are some with an ounce of decency - but the vast majority of the career politicians we allow to run our lives these days would.
-- answer removed --
-- answer removed --
-- answer removed --
-- answer removed --
The Tom Watson of the 1980's, Geoffrey Dickens MP, Conservarive, was equally as tenacious as Watson is now, in hunting out paedophiles.
Unfortunately, like Watson, he was sidelined and ignored and the monsters that prey on children continued. Dickens handed a dossier of the alledged abusers to the Home Secretary, Leon Brittan, who did nothing and apparently lost the evidence. That in its self is enough to arouse suspicion of the man. True there were a lot of incompetent men in the Cabinet at the time, but I don't think Brittans lack of urgency and action can be put down to incompetence.
Unfortunately, like Watson, he was sidelined and ignored and the monsters that prey on children continued. Dickens handed a dossier of the alledged abusers to the Home Secretary, Leon Brittan, who did nothing and apparently lost the evidence. That in its self is enough to arouse suspicion of the man. True there were a lot of incompetent men in the Cabinet at the time, but I don't think Brittans lack of urgency and action can be put down to incompetence.
-- answer removed --
Two piza's Watson had no proof and plod knew there was none either. And on top of that one of the accusers has made it known it was a 'joke'
There is no defence for Watson whatsoever, however much those on the left wish to twist it away from what he did. He is a nasty piece of work and the puppeteer of Corbyn.
There is no defence for Watson whatsoever, however much those on the left wish to twist it away from what he did. He is a nasty piece of work and the puppeteer of Corbyn.
1 to 12 of 12
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.