Divebuddy, From your link (although I’ve no idea who ‘myself’ is – or ‘Mike’).
//The point of all this is to note the fact that none of the elements of Ezekiel's vision are foreign to religious iconography of the times (or before Ezekiel's era). The cloud / storm element of the vision is very common to the Old Testament, and is chiefly aimed at Baal, the king of the gods at Ugarit (the storm god), which is outside Babylon, both terribly common to Israelite thinking. Hence the vision of Ezekiel, in many respects, is an amalgam of familiar (early) Israelite theophanic portrayals of Yahweh and Babylonian elements, all designed to put Yahweh "in the picture," ousting the pagan god(s).//
….. or alternatively it could mean that Ezekiel wasn’t the first to have experienced such a ‘vision’, not something your author considers. Interestingly, a chap called Josef Blumrich, former chief of NASA's systems layout branch of the program development office, whilst still in office, set out to debunk Ezekiel’s spaceship. He analysed several different translations of the bible and ended up writing a book describing and illustrating in detail what he thought Ezekiel actually saw. A spaceship. He concluded that the technology of the builders must have been somewhat in advance of mankind’s at present, and said he had “seldom felt as delighted, satisfied, and fascinated by being proven wrong”. He also published an article "The spaceships of the prophet Ezekiel", in the UNESCO journal ‘Impact of Science on Society’.