ChatterBank6 mins ago
Killers Of Becky Watts Sentenced To 33 And 17 Years.
25 Answers
http:// www.dai lymail. co.uk/n ews/art icle-33 16857/T his-des picable -act-ev il-neve r-forgi ven-for gotten- Becky-W atts-fa ther-te lls-cou rt-easi er-kill ers-tak en-copi ng-daug hter-s- death.h tml
Quite a substantial sentence but not in comparison with the families, why even the Judge was brought to tears.
Quite a substantial sentence but not in comparison with the families, why even the Judge was brought to tears.
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by anotheoldgit. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.“I would be interested to learn why the girl was only convicted of manslaughter and not murder.”
“Judge Dingemans told Hoare she had been convicted of manslaughter because she had participated in a kidnap where any "sober and reasonable person" would have known some harm would come to Becky.”
To support a murder charge the prosecution has to prove an intention to kill. We cannot really go into the debate about whether Hoare showed that intention or not because we don’t have the full facts, only the very abridged version of events we have been fed by the media.
“Judge Dingemans told Hoare she had been convicted of manslaughter because she had participated in a kidnap where any "sober and reasonable person" would have known some harm would come to Becky.”
To support a murder charge the prosecution has to prove an intention to kill. We cannot really go into the debate about whether Hoare showed that intention or not because we don’t have the full facts, only the very abridged version of events we have been fed by the media.
Yes quite so, jackdaw.
I have not been following all the grizzly details of this case but it seems Hoare was stood trial for murder but was acquitted and found guilty of manslaughter in the alternative. As I said earlier, it is difficult to determine why the jury found the way that they did but they had six weeks' worth of evidence to consider whilst we have only a few column inches.
One dreadful aspect of this appalling matter which seems to have been somewhat glossed over is that the victim's father and the murderer's mother are married to each other. Quite how they will manage that for the rest of their lives is anybody's guess.
I have not been following all the grizzly details of this case but it seems Hoare was stood trial for murder but was acquitted and found guilty of manslaughter in the alternative. As I said earlier, it is difficult to determine why the jury found the way that they did but they had six weeks' worth of evidence to consider whilst we have only a few column inches.
One dreadful aspect of this appalling matter which seems to have been somewhat glossed over is that the victim's father and the murderer's mother are married to each other. Quite how they will manage that for the rest of their lives is anybody's guess.
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.