Donate SIGN UP

Is It Time To Tell The Right On Liberals Where To Get Off?

Avatar Image
youngmafbog | 00:15 Sat 14th Nov 2015 | News
89 Answers
Internment, boots on the ground, send them to their maker, whatever.

Surely enough is enough, the friends and sympathisers of Jihad and those that just dont seem to get that a hard hand is required need to be told to shut it or join their mates in internment. The HRA and the scum lawyers feeding off it also need to go.

And as for schengen, that has to be the end, together with locking down all those bogus Asylum seekers. ISIS threatened to flood Europe, here we go.

This is only the beginning.

Gravatar

Answers

41 to 60 of 89rss feed

First Previous 1 2 3 4 5 Next Last

Best Answer

No best answer has yet been selected by youngmafbog. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.

For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
You have what you wished for. Enjoy.
Don't have granddaughters, do you?
vetuste ennemi

// What is the "source", Gromit? //

An evil variation of Islam from Saudi Arabia. They propagated it by building Madrasses in Pakistan, and a generation later these ideas have corrupted our Pakistani youth.

// innit //
What?

// You have what you wished for. Enjoy. //
I haven't wished for anything. Immigration from Asia started before I was born.




Multiculturalism implies assimilation and acceptance of attitudes inconsistent with its premises, innit? You want people here who don't as ccept our standards of tolerance. How is that supposed to work?
Poorly described. There must be shared values and moral attirudes for a mix ed population to work, surely?
I can't even stand you, Gromit.
// Multiculturalism implies assimilation and acceptance of attitudes inconsistent with its premises, innit? //

// There must be shared values and moral attirudes (sic) for a mix ed population to work //

We have an Asian immigrant population because our obligations due to end of Empire and colonialism. They were of the British Empire which was the only shared value that mattered. That may be wrong, but the mistake (if you think it is one) was made nearly 70 years ago.

West Indian immigration solved a jobs crisis in the 1950s.

Recent eastern European immigration is due to our shared membership of the EU commenced in 1973.

Like it or not, for various reasons, we have a small immigrate population, and we have to get on. If there are enemies within that population, we should seek them out. But we should not treat them all as enemies. That would be self defeating.
Was your last post an attempt at rational discourse, Gromit?
I do have a course in the subject. Only £15 a session.
Reduced rate for three or more. You know two others, innit?
vetuste ennemi
Unfortunately your course seems to be out of date, and therefore vastly over priced.
You're not very bright, are you, Gromit?
But I'm sure you have a second cousin who is.
I may not be bright, but I have not resorted to personal attacks. Not a good move if you are trying to be superior.
This is all getting very petty and boring. Time to concentrate on one of the other threads. Enjoy your day.
v_e; //The vicious attitudes which drive ISIS are not local (I.e. Levantine) peculiarities. They're literal interpretations of 7th century barbarism and thrive in Tower Hamlets and Bradford just as much as in Palmyra or Mosul.//

To think that ISIS is driven solely by adherence to the Islamic religion and '7th Century barbarism' is to make a grave mistake. Islamism is a POLITICAL force with an objective of world domination, it always has been and always will be. Wherever it has overrun a country it has brought havoc and destruction. The reason that the Ottoman Empire collapsed was because it had nothing left to destroy and live off, and made no contribution to the development of that country whatsoever, building mosques for the masses and palaces for the Sultans and their numerous concubines.

Erdogan in Turkey may this morning be sending his condolences to Paris, but his dream is for an Sunni Islamic fascist state throughout the middle East (and beyond) - the same objective as ISIS really, - a new Ottoman Empire, and guess who'd be in charge?
Khandro, //To think that ISIS is driven solely by adherence to the Islamic religion and '7th Century barbarism' is to make a grave mistake. Islamism is a POLITICAL force with an objective of world domination//

No, it isn't a mistake. Islam is a political force but its driven solely by religion. Without the religion the politics wouldn't exist. We have to stop excusing religion. In this instance it is entirely culpable.
naomi; Please re-read what you have quoted, I said "solely".
".......there is little connection between religious piety and terrorism among Muslims. A "restricted" report of hundreds of case studies by the domestic counter-intelligence agency MI5 found that •
far from being religious zealots, a large number of those involved in terrorism do not practise their faith regularly. Many lack religious literacy and could actually be regarded as religious novices. Very few have been brought up in strongly religious households, and there is a higher than average proportion of converts. Some are involved in drug-taking, drinking alcohol and visiting prostitutes. MI5 says there is evidence that a well-established religious identity actually protects against violent radicalisation."

source; Wikipedia•
As one of 'AB's resident right-wing extremists' it is strange that I am against such gung-ho tactics as putting British boots on the ground in foreign lands.

This is just what these barbarians want, nothing better for their publicity for them to capture one or two of our troops and invent even more macabre ways of dispatching them.

Much better for us to turn our attention on the enemy we already have here, closing all the Mosques would be a good start.

Seems rather strange though that all 'AB's resident far-left extremists', would be totally against anything that might upset our enemy within.
Naomi,
Western leaders have to be Christian - Reagan, Thatcher, Blair, Bush 1&2, Obama and Cameron. Their ideology is driven by their Christian beliefs, and that has resulted in ruination for the middle east and north Africa.

Their desire for domination over the Russians has destabilised the whole region. The British and French meddled when we acquired the remains of the Ottoman Empire. But things got a lot worse after WWII with the onset of the cold war and the ascendancy of The US.

Communism was ungodly, and our Christian leaders have torn the middle east apart trying to drive the Russians out. In the process they have alienated scores of countries and hundreds of millions of people against our duplicious ways.

The big change came in 1980. The Iranian revolution overthrough a US puppet regime and encouraged the muslim world that they could overthrough their puppet leaders.
Also in 1980, the Russian War in Afghanistan saw the emergance of religious freedom fighters from across the muslim world, prepared to fight a religious war to replace the Russians with a fundamental muslim rule in Afghanistan. So the US gave Bin Laden and his fighters money, weaponry and expertise to beat the Russians. The Taliban took over and Bin Laden set up Al qaeda. It has been downhill ever since.

We have been reaping what we have sown ever since.

41 to 60 of 89rss feed

First Previous 1 2 3 4 5 Next Last

Do you know the answer?

Is It Time To Tell The Right On Liberals Where To Get Off?

Answer Question >>

Related Questions

Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.