Film, Media & TV6 mins ago
Climate Change Songs?
29 Answers
Apart from that fact that I personally perceive the notion of 'climate change' as arrant nonsense - it is interesting that it's not been possible to parlay a hit out of it.
It reminds me that when Prince Charles married Lady Diana, I compiled a radio piece about the simple fact that of the twenty-plus 'comedy' songs about the union, not one came anywhere near the charts. Media URL: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/magazine-34844244
Description:
It reminds me that when Prince Charles married Lady Diana, I compiled a radio piece about the simple fact that of the twenty-plus 'comedy' songs about the union, not one came anywhere near the charts. Media URL: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/magazine-34844244
Description:
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by andy-hughes. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.The conflicting information is one issue, certainly. The other is that I think people have a tendency to overlook that there is a difference between gross contribution and net contribution. The gross effect of human carbon emissions is relatively small compared to natural sources -- the equivalent of roughly 1 part in 20, I believe -- and so it's easy to dupe yourself into thinking "so bloody what then?" But the net effect is a lot larger, because a great deal of greenhouse gas emissions are reabsorbed already, so that the excess due to human activity ends up contributing at a far greater rate than the headline figure of 4% or so.
The "gross vs. net" thing shouldn't be too hard to appreciate. As to "climate change has always been happening". Well, duh. This is not a recent revelation and, believe it or not, scientists have kind of noticed this. Just as there is gross v. net, though, there is also signal vs. background. It's a basic principle of data analysis and, again, is probably being overlooked by the sceptics.
The "gross vs. net" thing shouldn't be too hard to appreciate. As to "climate change has always been happening". Well, duh. This is not a recent revelation and, believe it or not, scientists have kind of noticed this. Just as there is gross v. net, though, there is also signal vs. background. It's a basic principle of data analysis and, again, is probably being overlooked by the sceptics.
-- answer removed --
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.