ChatterBank0 min ago
This Is A Complete Disgrace, How Can The Authorities Allow This To Happen?
17 Answers
http:// www.dai lymail. co.uk/n ews/art icle-33 91179/2 80-Brit ish-Ira q-veter ans-hou nded-de spicabl e-witch -hunt-c laims-t orture- murder. html
If the military were allowed to strike, this would be a good reason to do so.
If the military were allowed to strike, this would be a good reason to do so.
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by anotheoldgit. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.See also this thread, from a week ago, although the story appears to have moved on since: http:// www.the answerb ank.co. uk/News /Questi on14660 99.html
It's important to hold our soldiers to account. After all, they are fighting to protect the standards of life that some of them have (allegedly) broken. But I think ymb had it largely right. This has dragged on for far too long, and surely could/should have been resolved far quicker than it has been. I think it's likely that there is some substance behind the claims, but equally many of the soldiers currently being questioned are likely to be innocent (or at any rate guilty of nothing more than making a snap judgement in horrific circumstances), so the longer this rolls on the worse it will be for them.
I hope that this doesn't drag on any longer.
It's important to hold our soldiers to account. After all, they are fighting to protect the standards of life that some of them have (allegedly) broken. But I think ymb had it largely right. This has dragged on for far too long, and surely could/should have been resolved far quicker than it has been. I think it's likely that there is some substance behind the claims, but equally many of the soldiers currently being questioned are likely to be innocent (or at any rate guilty of nothing more than making a snap judgement in horrific circumstances), so the longer this rolls on the worse it will be for them.
I hope that this doesn't drag on any longer.
Perhaps those who carry out torturous and inhumane treatment on our own should be punished first?
http:// www.dai lymail. co.uk/n ews/art icle-33 90561/I nfantry -soldie r-22-di ed-heat stroke- forced- carry-e xhausti ng-mili tary-be asting- one-hot test-da ys-year -corone r-says. html
http://
I would hope that anything said on the doorstep which had been tricked or manipulated from the former soldiers by these wannabee *** would be ruled inadmissable as they are not obliged to say anything and should be cautioned on their rights to remain silent etc . Digusting and shame on the government for wasting more taxpayers money on a witch hunt.
Islay, the geneva convention is designed to protect all non-combatants, whether civilian, or military personnel no longer in the theatre of battle through imprisonment, or medical reason. Since when did concert goers and restaurant diners in Paris fall outside the protection of the convention you say you hold so dear? why is it OK for Daesh/ISIS/ISIL (delete as applicable) to ignore it?
It doesn't say who the alleged victims are other than" insurgents on the front line" As it doesn't go down the emotive women and children road we can assume they may be lawful or unlawful combatants. If the victims were mercenaries,as are most of Daesh in the present conflict, then they cannot shelter under the protection of the Geneva convention. It does not apply and Islamic State is not a Sovereign state either.
If more information were forthcoming as to who exactly the alleged victims were and their status at the time then it would be easier to trot out the Geneva convention in this debate but the answer is we don't know in this scenario.
hge
If more information were forthcoming as to who exactly the alleged victims were and their status at the time then it would be easier to trot out the Geneva convention in this debate but the answer is we don't know in this scenario.
hge
Unless I am mistaken, the police give that statement only if a person has been arrested - That's not the case Mr Corby ^.
"Some of the soldiers are not being told they are not obliged to speak. ‘It seems they are using underhand tactics to try and get these soldiers to talk,’ Col Kemp said" - If these investigators are in breach of regulations then hopefully they will also be rigorously dealt with with.
"Some of the soldiers are not being told they are not obliged to speak. ‘It seems they are using underhand tactics to try and get these soldiers to talk,’ Col Kemp said" - If these investigators are in breach of regulations then hopefully they will also be rigorously dealt with with.
// I would hope that anything said on the doorstep which had been tricked or manipulated from the former soldiers by these wannabee *** would be ruled inadmissable as they are not obliged to say anything and should be cautioned on their rights to remain silent etc // retro
I am shocked I am truly shocked that this sort of thing should go on in any law inforcement agency
actually in english criminal procedure it is very hard to get anything ruled inadmissible isnt it ?
remember sgt Blackman was convicted shooting someone lying on the ground without a firearm whilst quoting shakespeare.... Hamlet I think
I am shocked I am truly shocked that this sort of thing should go on in any law inforcement agency
actually in english criminal procedure it is very hard to get anything ruled inadmissible isnt it ?
remember sgt Blackman was convicted shooting someone lying on the ground without a firearm whilst quoting shakespeare.... Hamlet I think
'actually in english criminal procedure it is very hard to get anything ruled inadmissible isnt it ? "
http:// www.dai lymail. co.uk/n ews/art icle-25 44469/H ero-pol ice-off icer-fa cing-sa ck-fail ed-caut ion-mur derer-c onfesse d-two-k illings -led-bo dies.ht ml
http://
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.