If There Was Any Doubt Of Labour's Anti...
News1 min ago
Vigilante Stings - Are They Justified ?
http://
Judge Richard Foster said: "This group had taken upon itself to track down individuals they perceived to be paedophiles. The courts cannot encourage vigilantes or groups like this and the proper course of action is to involve the police and to leave the police to do the work."
Is this sort of sting acceptable, provided when once having caught the offenders they then hand them over unharmed to the police ?
The judge says "no", I wonder what the police say.
Judge Richard Foster said: "This group had taken upon itself to track down individuals they perceived to be paedophiles. The courts cannot encourage vigilantes or groups like this and the proper course of action is to involve the police and to leave the police to do the work."
Is this sort of sting acceptable, provided when once having caught the offenders they then hand them over unharmed to the police ?
The judge says "no", I wonder what the police say.
Answers
set a trap for low life scum and catch some, now there's a funny thing. true to from post from canary!
17:12 Sun 31st Jan 2016
-- answer removed --
if you justify vigilante action "because they're paedophiles", how much of a step beyond that is the legitimising of murder "because they're paedophiles".......
http://
http://
http://
http://
http://
http://
Decent,honest civilians who are appaled at the disgusting depraved actions of perverts and are doing their civic duty by accruing evidence and handing them over to police. Lucky the police get this scum intact and unharmed.
Years gone by the police would recommend the beak commend these people for doing a public duty and would be none to worried about the condition they were in when handed into custody.
Years gone by the police would recommend the beak commend these people for doing a public duty and would be none to worried about the condition they were in when handed into custody.
retro
I am not sure if you are saying the police support vigilante groups or dont support them....
the official view of those smooth chief constables armed with -ology degrees ( and your erstwhile masters ) is that they DON'T support them innit ?
I am confused that you are going against very clear guidelines
[ or perhaps they arent that clear - I could be wrong and frequently am]
I am not sure if you are saying the police support vigilante groups or dont support them....
the official view of those smooth chief constables armed with -ology degrees ( and your erstwhile masters ) is that they DON'T support them innit ?
I am confused that you are going against very clear guidelines
[ or perhaps they arent that clear - I could be wrong and frequently am]
Depends what hat they are wearing at the time.The police have to publicly condemn vigilantes. "Oh no totally wrong.It is our job to bring these filthy felons to justice. We are the trained experienced guardians of justice. Just leave it to us!"
Meanwhile if you no longer wear that hat and have grand children who you love and would happily kill for to protect their innocence and well being then human nature says,"If the police are so restrained and cash strapped and shackled by political interference to turn a blind eye to prominent paedophiles then let those who are not so restricted do what is right for their fellow citizens.
Meanwhile if you no longer wear that hat and have grand children who you love and would happily kill for to protect their innocence and well being then human nature says,"If the police are so restrained and cash strapped and shackled by political interference to turn a blind eye to prominent paedophiles then let those who are not so restricted do what is right for their fellow citizens.
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.