Perhaps, but sadly this sort of thing is becoming more common. He has already been offered vouchers when really the store was under no obligation to open or to serve him even if it were open. Is this any worse though than the woman who claimed a lifetime supply of free kit kats because one bar had no wafer but was just solid chocolate.
But why do the papers treat their readers as if we are thick- do we really need to be reminded what a pack of mince looks like.
I would have objected a being to to the shop did not open till the animal they spelt wrong did what .should it not have read shop won't open till llama arrives
I don't shop, but if I did, I would be thoroughly *** off having to wait in my car for an hour. We are not talking "corner shop " here, but an international concern.
I doubt wether I would sue the company, but certainly make my feelings known to management.
Surely his beef is not that it was spoilt but that he was incited out to shop at a time which was unsuitable due to erroneous information, thus being put to inconvenience. The shop should be rapped over the knuckles for that. However the meat spoiling thing has become too big an issue. It was his choice not to go home and shop later, or elsewhere. Although I can understand the annoyance and determination to shop where he had made up his mind to shop, and on the journey he was enticed to make.
I do think he's pathetic. Most of us would have just gone home. Nobody in their right mind sits in a hot car for an hour just for the bloody-mindedness of it.
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.