Donate SIGN UP

Answers

1 to 3 of 3rss feed

Best Answer

No best answer has yet been selected by agchristie. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.

For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
I think incentives are best matched to individuals and their particular issues. A blanket reduction of income would hit guilty and innocent alike. Surely the welfare paid out is simply what is needed anyway, so a reduction will cause hardship. In any case there are plenty of non health impaired folk out of work that could be helped to find a job first. I think this seems a sledgehammer swung wildly in the hope of cracking the odd nut. The bish is probably right to comment.
man in ridiculous outfit who believes in an omnipotent creator being speaks on mental health. Mmm.
The answer of course is let them suffer more & then some of the more desperate will take their own lives & be out of it & the government will then of course save more money. Well done Mr Cameron & your splendid Tory colleagues. ( Are there no workhouses, are there no prisons ? )

1 to 3 of 3rss feed

Do you know the answer?

Bishop Challenges Cameron's Mental Health Reforms

Answer Question >>

Related Questions

Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.