ChatterBank43 mins ago
The Hooray Henries Are Back !
http:// www.bbc .co.uk/ news/uk -politi cs-3565 1049
Perhaps they never went away !
Instead of facing up to the mess that the NHS is in, the Tories descend into childish schoolboy behaviour. Yah-boo politics, at its worst.
On the eve of yet another strike by Doctors, shouldn't the PM and his party at least try to act as adults ?
Perhaps they never went away !
Instead of facing up to the mess that the NHS is in, the Tories descend into childish schoolboy behaviour. Yah-boo politics, at its worst.
On the eve of yet another strike by Doctors, shouldn't the PM and his party at least try to act as adults ?
Answers
I have to say that I have every sympathy with Mr Cameron and Mr Corbyn and their daily wrangles across the dispatch box. As veterans of heated debate in the News section, we have both observed how easy it is to be drawn into increasingly childish and pointless exchanges with people who are also old enough to know better. Indeed, it is with astonishing ease that...
19:43 Wed 24th Feb 2016
In view of the Crisis in the NHS in England Mikey, I think the Wales / Scotland NHS Staff should back England up with this, can you remember the split between the Yorkshire / Nottingham miners strike? Thatcher said she would look after the Nottingham miners, she did, they soon went after the destruction of the NUM In Nottingham, this lot want sorting before every woring person's right have gone, & go it will, S.Wales will back that up as you will remember.
Mrblear.....so why are the called 'junior' doctors and not just 'doctors' and why do they have to take more exams? The ones who would be treating you in A&E would be the ones going through the training I refer to.
Anyway, AOG, I believe that The Junior Doctors should have the moral fibre to think that striking is blackmail and refrain from it at all costs rather than it being an imposed legality.
Anyway, AOG, I believe that The Junior Doctors should have the moral fibre to think that striking is blackmail and refrain from it at all costs rather than it being an imposed legality.
Mrblear:
http:// www.bma .org.uk /develo ping-yo ur-care er/medi cal-stu dent/th e-role- of-the- doctor/ role-of -the-ju nior-do ctor
'Furthermore, the roles of a junior doctor as a professional, as a trainee, and in delivering healthcare service cannot be separated. Properly supervised service is essential to training.' Note the words 'trainee' and 'training'.
http://
'Furthermore, the roles of a junior doctor as a professional, as a trainee, and in delivering healthcare service cannot be separated. Properly supervised service is essential to training.' Note the words 'trainee' and 'training'.
Zacs-Master - //Anyway, AOG, I believe that The Junior Doctors should have the moral fibre to think that striking is blackmail and refrain from it at all costs rather than it being an imposed legality. //
As long as there have been workers, the only way that the vast majority of workers to express their dissatisfaction with being bullied by employers is to withdraw their labour.
That is the only tool at their disposal that will actually have any effect.
So I have no doubt - as I have said before - that any JD going on strike is fully aware of the consequences of their action, which is obviously the point of it, and has had to wrestle with their conscience about their action.
To imply that they lack 'moral fibre' simply because some people think that they are some sort of special case, and should be denied the right of expression available to almost every other working person, simply because of the type of work they do, is fundamentally wrong.
Would you refuse to strike because someone told you that you shouldn't because you are 'exempt' from the rights of your peers to express yourself?
I wouldn't!
As long as there have been workers, the only way that the vast majority of workers to express their dissatisfaction with being bullied by employers is to withdraw their labour.
That is the only tool at their disposal that will actually have any effect.
So I have no doubt - as I have said before - that any JD going on strike is fully aware of the consequences of their action, which is obviously the point of it, and has had to wrestle with their conscience about their action.
To imply that they lack 'moral fibre' simply because some people think that they are some sort of special case, and should be denied the right of expression available to almost every other working person, simply because of the type of work they do, is fundamentally wrong.
Would you refuse to strike because someone told you that you shouldn't because you are 'exempt' from the rights of your peers to express yourself?
I wouldn't!
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.