Business & Finance3 mins ago
Has This Cultural Different Sexual Offender Got Off Extremely Light?
30 Answers
/// Judge Cottle said if he sent the defendant, of St Pauls, Bristol, to prison, the sentence would be short and he would come out an untreated sex offender. ///
/// The Thames Valley Sex Offenders Treatment Programme was a demanding course, he said, and would be part of a three-year community order with
supervision. ///
What was wrong in sending him to prison and then after serving his sentence sending him on this sex offenders treatment programme?
Or even better sending him on the next plane back from whence he came.
http:// www.dai lymail. co.uk/n ews/art icle-34 79646/M igrant- s-child -sex-at tack-bl amed-cu ltural- differe nces-So malian- claimed -misund erstood -bounda ries-gi ven-com munity- order.h tml
/// The Thames Valley Sex Offenders Treatment Programme was a demanding course, he said, and would be part of a three-year community order with
supervision. ///
What was wrong in sending him to prison and then after serving his sentence sending him on this sex offenders treatment programme?
Or even better sending him on the next plane back from whence he came.
http://
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by anotheoldgit. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.another case where they fell for it hook line and sinker...he tried it on and got caught and his lawyer came up with the "cultural differences" wheeze..and it worked.....
not a day goes past and these scum dont take us for mugs one way or another.
As AOG says why cant we get rid of these unwanted savages, we dont need them..
not a day goes past and these scum dont take us for mugs one way or another.
As AOG says why cant we get rid of these unwanted savages, we dont need them..
The cultural different defence was rejected by the judge, so that had no part in the sentencing.
The judge describe the offences as not serious. It is unclear from the Mail report what he was actually charged with, so it is impossible to find out whether the sentence is lenient, or standard for this offence.
The very fact that There is a treatment centre suggests that not serious offenders are sent there. So he will not be the first offender to be sent there.
Deportation for trying to kiss a girl would be over the top. Sounds like you are latching on to the flimsiest excuse to deport foreigners.
The judge describe the offences as not serious. It is unclear from the Mail report what he was actually charged with, so it is impossible to find out whether the sentence is lenient, or standard for this offence.
The very fact that There is a treatment centre suggests that not serious offenders are sent there. So he will not be the first offender to be sent there.
Deportation for trying to kiss a girl would be over the top. Sounds like you are latching on to the flimsiest excuse to deport foreigners.
@bazwillrun
If you read the article, it says the judge dismissed the "cultural differences" excuse as "rubbish".
The article is sparse on details but first girl: an attempt to kiss; second, a "lunge" (no detail of what this means; a lunge can be a pounce which misses its mark); third: his conversation caused her grave concern.
I have to ask whether drunken or incompetent fumblers, in a nightclub, are as equally guilty of sexual offences as this iriot is?
Three in succession elevates the seriousness of the case, I my opinion. A re-education course seems entirely appropriate.
Lastly, I don't understand the defendant's claim to come from a *conservative* culture. Surely that should mean that they are more hands off, less predatory than what he displayed here.
Is it a backhanded way of saying he thinks our society is too permissive and he expects that intimate contact with complete strangers, in public places (even while commuting) is the norm?
By the way, I wonder if his wife will ever get to hear of this incident?
If you read the article, it says the judge dismissed the "cultural differences" excuse as "rubbish".
The article is sparse on details but first girl: an attempt to kiss; second, a "lunge" (no detail of what this means; a lunge can be a pounce which misses its mark); third: his conversation caused her grave concern.
I have to ask whether drunken or incompetent fumblers, in a nightclub, are as equally guilty of sexual offences as this iriot is?
Three in succession elevates the seriousness of the case, I my opinion. A re-education course seems entirely appropriate.
Lastly, I don't understand the defendant's claim to come from a *conservative* culture. Surely that should mean that they are more hands off, less predatory than what he displayed here.
Is it a backhanded way of saying he thinks our society is too permissive and he expects that intimate contact with complete strangers, in public places (even while commuting) is the norm?
By the way, I wonder if his wife will ever get to hear of this incident?
@Gladeian
//such conduct is unacceptable.//
Warning signs ("no inappropriate touching", etc) or a poster campaign (csption in their languages) ought to be seriously considered but it would be "tarring them all with the same brush" and not get past the PC brigade.
Lots of talk of finding homes and jobs for migrants but no politician dares even allude to attempts at cultural 'reprogramming' before being released into our society. It is seen as "culturally insensitive" to tell them their attitude to women is wrong.
//such conduct is unacceptable.//
Warning signs ("no inappropriate touching", etc) or a poster campaign (csption in their languages) ought to be seriously considered but it would be "tarring them all with the same brush" and not get past the PC brigade.
Lots of talk of finding homes and jobs for migrants but no politician dares even allude to attempts at cultural 'reprogramming' before being released into our society. It is seen as "culturally insensitive" to tell them their attitude to women is wrong.
Hypognosis
/// Warning signs ("no inappropriate touching", etc) or a poster campaign (csption in their languages) ought to be seriously considered ///
Already in operation in Germany.
http:// i.daily mail.co .uk/i/p ix/2016 /02/01/ 13/30C6 DC66000 00578-3 426142- One_car toon_sh ows_a_h and_att empting _to_gro pe_a_wo man_wea ring_a_ b-a-6_1 4543341 35473.j pg
/// Warning signs ("no inappropriate touching", etc) or a poster campaign (csption in their languages) ought to be seriously considered ///
Already in operation in Germany.
http://
I would suggest that living and working in the UK from 2011 would educate even the most obtuse immigrant of the basics in gender interaction in western society.
The fact that every single day this man will have observed that men and women do not leap on complete strangers should have given him the hint that this is not acceptable behaviour in the society in which he is now living.
I would agree that the 'cultural difference' defence was seriously weak, but the only one available. It is his counsel's job to defend him, hence the offer of the reason, and it is the judge's job to find that reason seriously wanting, and to dismiss it.
As to sentencing, I, as others, have no idea if sentencing has been appropriately applied, but I have to agree that deportation may be something a little OTT.
The fact that every single day this man will have observed that men and women do not leap on complete strangers should have given him the hint that this is not acceptable behaviour in the society in which he is now living.
I would agree that the 'cultural difference' defence was seriously weak, but the only one available. It is his counsel's job to defend him, hence the offer of the reason, and it is the judge's job to find that reason seriously wanting, and to dismiss it.
As to sentencing, I, as others, have no idea if sentencing has been appropriately applied, but I have to agree that deportation may be something a little OTT.
Gromit
/// You know next to nothing about him. He has a job and therefore will pay tax. He is worth exactly the same as everyone else in that position. ///
Oh so that allows him the right to fiddle with 'our' women then does it?
I make no apologies to those who are rather over sensitive regarding my use of the word 'OUR'.
/// You know next to nothing about him. He has a job and therefore will pay tax. He is worth exactly the same as everyone else in that position. ///
Oh so that allows him the right to fiddle with 'our' women then does it?
I make no apologies to those who are rather over sensitive regarding my use of the word 'OUR'.
The fact that his “cultural differences” mitigation was rejected by the judge hardly the point.
The very fact that such ludicrous nonsense can even be suggested by a lawyer sums up the problems presented by this country’s dalliance with “multiculturalism”. That warped philosophy would encourage us to believe that all cultures are equally valid, equally acceptable and that none should be denounced. Whether it was true or whether it was simply concocted for the benefit of the court, this gentleman’s belief that it is acceptable to behave the way he did was put forward as a valid excuse. So we have in our midst people whose “culture” – they claim as an excuse for their transgressions – includes the acceptable molestation of women (but whose religion strangely does not allow them to see a naked female ankle nor a bare head or arm unless and until they marry the woman).
And we wonder why we have problems.
The very fact that such ludicrous nonsense can even be suggested by a lawyer sums up the problems presented by this country’s dalliance with “multiculturalism”. That warped philosophy would encourage us to believe that all cultures are equally valid, equally acceptable and that none should be denounced. Whether it was true or whether it was simply concocted for the benefit of the court, this gentleman’s belief that it is acceptable to behave the way he did was put forward as a valid excuse. So we have in our midst people whose “culture” – they claim as an excuse for their transgressions – includes the acceptable molestation of women (but whose religion strangely does not allow them to see a naked female ankle nor a bare head or arm unless and until they marry the woman).
And we wonder why we have problems.
AOG
It's difficult to determine whether he got off lightly without knowing what the specifics of the offence were.
But I agree with andy-hughes here, that after half a decade, he really ought to have sussed out social norms...
...unless...unless...he is a football fan? I mean, with Ched Evans and Adam Johnson giving the lead, God only knows what immigrants must think our social norms are.
...especially when ew are told that 15 years old girls 'know what they are up to'.
Incidentally AOG...have you developed some strange allergy to adverbs?
'Culturally' and 'lightly' please.
It's difficult to determine whether he got off lightly without knowing what the specifics of the offence were.
But I agree with andy-hughes here, that after half a decade, he really ought to have sussed out social norms...
...unless...unless...he is a football fan? I mean, with Ched Evans and Adam Johnson giving the lead, God only knows what immigrants must think our social norms are.
...especially when ew are told that 15 years old girls 'know what they are up to'.
Incidentally AOG...have you developed some strange allergy to adverbs?
'Culturally' and 'lightly' please.
-- answer removed --
-- answer removed --
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.