ChatterBank2 mins ago
Epiphany Part 2!
15 Answers
http:// www.bbc .co.uk/ news/uk -politi cs-3579 3764
"Mainstream with sensible policies" - stop it I'm hurting here!
"Mainstream with sensible policies" - stop it I'm hurting here!
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by ToraToraTora. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.The more you post about McDonnell, the more I like him. And he isn't wrong here.
Cuts to services save very little money. The cuts in the name of so called austerity are merely the Conservatives' ideological quest for a small public service. The cuts are not necessary, they are a choice.
Taking away Disable Living Allowance in the same week you give the well off a tax break is a political choice rather than a prudent move.
I look forward to your next McDonnell post.
Cuts to services save very little money. The cuts in the name of so called austerity are merely the Conservatives' ideological quest for a small public service. The cuts are not necessary, they are a choice.
Taking away Disable Living Allowance in the same week you give the well off a tax break is a political choice rather than a prudent move.
I look forward to your next McDonnell post.
The laughable Osborne talks about balancing the budget and making it illegal to set a deficit budget. Meanwhile he has borrowed £75billion this year and has missed his spending target yet again.
And the national debt, which was £980bn in 2010 is now over £1.5TRILLION.
https:/ /fullfa ct.org/ wp-cont ent/upl oads/20 15/04/t he_debt _hasn_t _double d.png
The Osborne Chancellorship is a house of cards built on debt, borrowing and even more borrowing.
And the national debt, which was £980bn in 2010 is now over £1.5TRILLION.
https:/
The Osborne Chancellorship is a house of cards built on debt, borrowing and even more borrowing.
//Mr McDonnell said under a Labour government borrowing would fund investment in new skills, infrastructure and technology.//
i know that as the party of opposition they don't (yet) have to set out anything detailed, but what on earth would "investment in new skills, infrastructure and technology" actually entail? does that mean the government in waiting actually doing some real good for the country and the majority of those living here? or is it a new way of spinning the tired old labour mantra of "build more schools! build more hospitals!" - a policy, incidentally, in which recent labour governments don't exactly have a unblemished track record....
http:// www.dai lymail. co.uk/n ews/art icle-34 88566/P arkland s-90m-z ombie-s chool-N O-pupil s-finan cial-sc andal-b light-c hildren -s-live s.html
i know that as the party of opposition they don't (yet) have to set out anything detailed, but what on earth would "investment in new skills, infrastructure and technology" actually entail? does that mean the government in waiting actually doing some real good for the country and the majority of those living here? or is it a new way of spinning the tired old labour mantra of "build more schools! build more hospitals!" - a policy, incidentally, in which recent labour governments don't exactly have a unblemished track record....
http://
Mushroom,
Osborne signed them too...
http:// www.the guardia n.com/p olitics /2011/a pr/18/g eorge-o sborne- backs-p fi-proj ects
Osborne signed them too...
http://
///"make sure that prosperity is shared by all".///
That ^^ will surely include more of these
http://