ChatterBank31 mins ago
Tribeca Withdraws Andrew Wakefield's Vaccination Film
8 Answers
http:// www.bbc .co.uk/ news/en tertain ment-ar ts-3590 6470
"We do not believe it contributes to or furthers the discussion I had hoped for", says Robert de Niro who initially supported its inclusion "for his autistic son". nevertheless it's a decision that could well be seen by supporters of Andrew Wakefield as the stifling of legitimate debate.
Good call by Mr de Niro?
"We do not believe it contributes to or furthers the discussion I had hoped for", says Robert de Niro who initially supported its inclusion "for his autistic son". nevertheless it's a decision that could well be seen by supporters of Andrew Wakefield as the stifling of legitimate debate.
Good call by Mr de Niro?
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by mushroom25. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.There is nothing very debatable left, in regards to this fraudster. He was widely discredited and he was struck off by the GMC :::::
https:/ /en.wik ipedia. org/wik i/Andre w_Wakef ield
Americans, with their in-built credulity, seem to be taken in by him, or some of them at least.
https:/
Americans, with their in-built credulity, seem to be taken in by him, or some of them at least.
He may have been hounded by a hack from the Daily Scrut
however he committed many and varied sins
I regret that the measles deaths that occurred as a result of his tinkering werent pinned on him. All the deaths were avoidable
The meme that doctors were intentionally damaging children by insisting on vaccination proved remarkably resistant even tho you could show deaths were resulting from vaccination refusal
and cost money to refute - which could be better spent doing something useful ( = lost opportunity cost - )
I think in the end they had to follow up large cohorts of vaccinated and unvaccinated children - thousands of them ..... v v expensive
The co-author Prof Walker got a well deserved beating for not acting as a brake
The big thing for the americans - Wakefield went to Texas where someone paid for his healthcentre.... was not the GMC case but that the Lancet withdrew his paper latterly and admitted it was crap
however he committed many and varied sins
I regret that the measles deaths that occurred as a result of his tinkering werent pinned on him. All the deaths were avoidable
The meme that doctors were intentionally damaging children by insisting on vaccination proved remarkably resistant even tho you could show deaths were resulting from vaccination refusal
and cost money to refute - which could be better spent doing something useful ( = lost opportunity cost - )
I think in the end they had to follow up large cohorts of vaccinated and unvaccinated children - thousands of them ..... v v expensive
The co-author Prof Walker got a well deserved beating for not acting as a brake
The big thing for the americans - Wakefield went to Texas where someone paid for his healthcentre.... was not the GMC case but that the Lancet withdrew his paper latterly and admitted it was crap
PP...what is rather worrying about this charlatan, is that despite all the bad publicity about his previous activities, he has been able to fool some more people, this time Americans, into believing him again.
What is wrong with these daft parents ? All they have to do is to spend 5 mins on Google, and everything should be clear, but instead they choose to believe a discredited and struck-off doctor !
Why can't people just use some simple common sense ?
What is wrong with these daft parents ? All they have to do is to spend 5 mins on Google, and everything should be clear, but instead they choose to believe a discredited and struck-off doctor !
Why can't people just use some simple common sense ?
//Why can't people just use some simple common sense ? //
not so simple though. the learned science and medical professionals are often at odds with each other and propose this theory, that theory, and send out contradictory messages.
1. MMR is safe.
2. err, no it isn't, well not entirely, if it uses the urabe mumps strain it has been documented to cause aseptic meningitis and febrile convulsions.
1. OK we'll use MMR 2, wich is based on the Jeryl Lynn strain.
2. that's as may be, but that's been known to cause inflammatory bowel disease.
and so it goes on - what is the scientifically uninformed parent to do for the best? particularly when the politicos of the day were all saying "it's safe" whilst at the same time ensuring their own kids were having the unlicenced single jabs?
not so simple though. the learned science and medical professionals are often at odds with each other and propose this theory, that theory, and send out contradictory messages.
1. MMR is safe.
2. err, no it isn't, well not entirely, if it uses the urabe mumps strain it has been documented to cause aseptic meningitis and febrile convulsions.
1. OK we'll use MMR 2, wich is based on the Jeryl Lynn strain.
2. that's as may be, but that's been known to cause inflammatory bowel disease.
and so it goes on - what is the scientifically uninformed parent to do for the best? particularly when the politicos of the day were all saying "it's safe" whilst at the same time ensuring their own kids were having the unlicenced single jabs?
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.