ChatterBank0 min ago
University Tells Students Britain 'invaded' Australia
And there’s me thinking the Aussies were down to earth, sensible people immune to the nonsense of political correctness. How disappointing.
http:// www.bbc .co.uk/ news/wo rld-aus tralia- 3592285 8
http://
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by naomi24. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.When one country takes over an area which is unpopulated and "belongs to no-one", i.e. makes it their territory, including introducing their police and military forces, (perhaps an example of an area not belonging to anybody would be Antarctica - no police or military involved, much) it is perhaps arguably not an invasion. When said area is populated by a different race and more or less up to the time of the takeover neither knew of each other's existence....what is that to be called (in any language) ?
We were certainly not invited, we just took.
It was a conquest, exactly the same as the Anglo Saxon and the Norman invadions of England. The indigenous Britons were over-run just as the aboriginies were in Australia.
If we refer to the Norman invasion and conquest of England, it is difficult to argue the settlement and colonisation of Australia was any different. 'Discovery' is a feeble term, it had been there forever, and populated for over 50,000 years.
It was a conquest, exactly the same as the Anglo Saxon and the Norman invadions of England. The indigenous Britons were over-run just as the aboriginies were in Australia.
If we refer to the Norman invasion and conquest of England, it is difficult to argue the settlement and colonisation of Australia was any different. 'Discovery' is a feeble term, it had been there forever, and populated for over 50,000 years.
The Chair is correct here...of course we invaded OZ ! We used it as a penal colony, to rid Britain of its petty criminals, who were proving to be a nuisance to our growing middle class.
People, including young children were sent to this penal colony, for committing the pettiest of crimes.
I recommend everybody to read "The Fatal Shore" by the late Robert Hughes
::
https:/ /en.wik ipedia. org/wik i/The_F atal_Sh ore
To quote the first line of the above Wiki entry :::
"The Fatal Shore. The epic of Australia's founding by Robert Hughes is a history of the birth of Australia which came out of the suffering and brutality of England's infamous convict transportation system"
And the aboriginal people continued to be treated appallingly, by the Oz Government up until recent times, and matters are still not perfect now.
People, including young children were sent to this penal colony, for committing the pettiest of crimes.
I recommend everybody to read "The Fatal Shore" by the late Robert Hughes
::
https:/
To quote the first line of the above Wiki entry :::
"The Fatal Shore. The epic of Australia's founding by Robert Hughes is a history of the birth of Australia which came out of the suffering and brutality of England's infamous convict transportation system"
And the aboriginal people continued to be treated appallingly, by the Oz Government up until recent times, and matters are still not perfect now.
Well what would you call it then? And why is it not an "invasion", of sorts? I suppose there was no formal military conquest, so maybe in that sense "invasion" is overstating it. We just ignored the locals, walked all over them and the land in which they had lived for ages, and in many cases (and not just in Australia) destroyed their livelihoods.
Does it rate the name conquest or invasion if there is no established civilisation there ? At what point in history does normal nomadic movement and displacement become invasions ? I think the activity isn't in question, it is the description and whether it warrants an emotive label. It does seem to fit some folk's agenda to portray us Brits, and Europe in general, as the bad guys simply because western Europe advanced far enough to take over control of much of the world at one point.
Progress isn't necessary, though, if you're living comfortably enough.
We shouldn't be romanticising too much indigenous ways of life, as they were not always so easy as watching a survival programme with Ray Mears in it, or something, might make out. Still -- and I would have thought that people supporting Brexit should appreciate this point even more than I do -- shouldn't that be the choice of the indigenous peoples how (and indeed if) they should "progress"? In Australia -- and everywhere else Europeans reached in their explorations -- that choice was, universally, taken away.
We shouldn't be romanticising too much indigenous ways of life, as they were not always so easy as watching a survival programme with Ray Mears in it, or something, might make out. Still -- and I would have thought that people supporting Brexit should appreciate this point even more than I do -- shouldn't that be the choice of the indigenous peoples how (and indeed if) they should "progress"? In Australia -- and everywhere else Europeans reached in their explorations -- that choice was, universally, taken away.
The voyage was a Royal Navy one, a branch of the military. If you look at the picture in the link, Cook is armed with a sword and his men have guns. The fact that the locals on this occassion offered little resistance is immaterial.
Later, when he tried to 'discover' Hawaii, the natives were not so friendly and killed him. He did after all, try to kidnap the King.
Later, when he tried to 'discover' Hawaii, the natives were not so friendly and killed him. He did after all, try to kidnap the King.
//There were already more than 250 tribes of Aboriginal people living on the land, each with their own language, customs and territories.
Then began a process of colonisation and land confiscation which denied Aboriginal rights to land, citizenship and equal status - rights which in many cases were only finally bestowed in recent decades.//
Sounds like invasion to me
Then began a process of colonisation and land confiscation which denied Aboriginal rights to land, citizenship and equal status - rights which in many cases were only finally bestowed in recent decades.//
Sounds like invasion to me
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.