Film, Media & TV66 mins ago
Should Britain First Use Lee Rigby's Name In Their Campaigns?
Lee Rigby's family have repeatedly asked Britain First not to use their son's name in their broadcast and online materials, but they have ignored this.
As Lee is a national public figure, are BF right to go ahead and include references to him - or should they take into account the wishes of his family?
http:// www.mir ror.co. uk/news /uk-new s/drumm er-lee- rigbys- family- blasts- 7797593
As Lee is a national public figure, are BF right to go ahead and include references to him - or should they take into account the wishes of his family?
http://
Answers
jno - //I can't see why not. Rigby was a grown man. At some point, parents cease to have proprietoria l rights over their children's identity. // That is true, but when their child meets a violent end at the hands of murderers, then the moral right to defend the use of his name by a fascist organisation surely reverts back to them? No doubt Lee Rigby would speak for...
08:05 Thu 21st Apr 2016
For one person in particular, it certainly does Naomi. I have crossed swords with her before on the subject of the far-right. Unfortunately I have forgotten her name ! There have been others as well.
But whatever the aims are of BF, they are, like the Telegraph says, a loathsome organisation.
Look at the fancy dress picture in the Mirror link.....childish is another name.
But whatever the aims are of BF, they are, like the Telegraph says, a loathsome organisation.
Look at the fancy dress picture in the Mirror link.....childish is another name.
I agree, if Lee Rigby's parents so wish his name should not be used. Although I fail to understand why they chose not to, if only it highlighted the seriousness of their son's murder, for example the Laurence family did not consider it a problem
But what must be asked is, can there not be any protest groups against certain things that are happening in this country (especially slaughter on our street as in this case) without them being automatically called Fascists, Nazis etc. What about far-left groups, should we also give them such pejorative names?
But what must be asked is, can there not be any protest groups against certain things that are happening in this country (especially slaughter on our street as in this case) without them being automatically called Fascists, Nazis etc. What about far-left groups, should we also give them such pejorative names?
andy; //The point is, the family have asked that the name not be used, and the BF have ignored them, which is morally wrong.//
I have said 09:07 that they should respect the family's wishes and not use his actual name, but the incident can most certainly be referred to. The question in the OP is should his name be used, not what anyone thinks of the organisation using it.
I have said 09:07 that they should respect the family's wishes and not use his actual name, but the incident can most certainly be referred to. The question in the OP is should his name be used, not what anyone thinks of the organisation using it.
AOG....here's another source, one that perhaps you can trust this time ::::
http:// www.dai lymail. co.uk/w ires/pa /articl e-35502 98/Not- Lee-Rig bys-Fam ily-pro test-ri ght-win g-adver t-Londo n-mayor .html
Still says "advert" .....Rather good article I thought !
http://
Still says "advert" .....Rather good article I thought !
mikey4444
/// AOG...if the Telegraph and Wiki calls BF "Far-right" and even your favorite newspaper, the DM also use the same phrase....then its good enough me ! ///
Nothing wrong in calling them Far-Right, just as there isn't in using the term, Far-Left, in fact in today's 'Hugging the centre position' all parties don't have to veer far from that position, until they are given the prefix 'FAR'.
It is your usage of the term far-right fascist, that I refer to.
Incidentally to be perfectly correct, Lee Rigby's family have asked 'ALL' political parties not to use his name in their campaigns.
/// AOG...if the Telegraph and Wiki calls BF "Far-right" and even your favorite newspaper, the DM also use the same phrase....then its good enough me ! ///
Nothing wrong in calling them Far-Right, just as there isn't in using the term, Far-Left, in fact in today's 'Hugging the centre position' all parties don't have to veer far from that position, until they are given the prefix 'FAR'.
It is your usage of the term far-right fascist, that I refer to.
Incidentally to be perfectly correct, Lee Rigby's family have asked 'ALL' political parties not to use his name in their campaigns.
Because Greta garbo used to say:
"I vaunt to be a lone"
means we should use her name and heavens look at her films ?
No I am not sure if anyone has rights in this at all ... - the Romans called it a damnatio memoriae and went around chiselling out names on plinths.
the family could skewer the BF by coming out against them ( rather than objecting to the use... )
"I vaunt to be a lone"
means we should use her name and heavens look at her films ?
No I am not sure if anyone has rights in this at all ... - the Romans called it a damnatio memoriae and went around chiselling out names on plinths.
the family could skewer the BF by coming out against them ( rather than objecting to the use... )
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.