Donate SIGN UP
Gravatar

Answers

61 to 70 of 70rss feed

First Previous 1 2 3 4

Best Answer

No best answer has yet been selected by bazwillrun. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.

For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
mikey4444 while I suspect many of the anti-Khan internet comments I've seen are indeed based on sour grapes I think many others of them share the sort of views expressed above by New Judge. I don't share those views, but having seen doom-and-gloom anti-SK comments all day with no explanation of them, I thought I'd at least see if I could get a viewpoint less vague than those, which I now have.
Our sufferings today are the prelude of those you, Europeans and Western Christians, will also suffer in the near future. I lost my diocese. The physical setting of my apostolate has been occupied by Islamic radicals who want us converted or dead. But my community is still alive.

Please, try to understand us. Your liberal and democratic principles are worth nothing here. You must consider again our reality in the Middle East, because you are welcoming in your countries an ever growing number of Muslims. Also you are in danger. You must take strong and courageous decisions, even at the cost of contradicting your principles. You think all men are equal, but that is not true: Islam does not say that all men are equal. Your values are not their values. If you do not understand this soon enough, you will become the victims of the enemy you have welcomed in your home.

Archbishop Amel Nona Chaldean Catholic Archeparch of Mosul,
It’s nothing to do with sour grapes Mikey. If Mr Khan had been a Conservative my feelings would be exactly the same.

There are more than 1.1m Muslims in London. As I have explained earlier it is virtually certain that a large percentage of Muslims, probably in the high nineties, who voted will have cast their vote for Mr Khan. Among other religions there is usually a split of Tory and Labour supporters. This is probably true of Muslims too. However, their overriding “duty” (see the Lutfur Rahman judgement) will be to see a Muslim candidate elected if one is standing and this will take precedence over anything else. Hence the vote is skewed by religious considerations.

Mr Goldsmith was a lacklustre candidate and would probably have been hard pushed to win in any circumstances. However, the size of Mr Khan’s majority was unlikely to have been so great but for the dutiful voting of Muslims. This will become an increasingly apparent feature of all UK elections which brings us back to the question. This country is being slowly but surely changed beyond recognition. This has nothing to do with my usual hobby horse (the EU). It is to do with the sacrifices that successive governments have made on the altar of “multiculturalism”. Mr Khan’s election is a symptom of that capitulation and the country will come to despise the politicians who saw us through this period.
Question Author
well said NJ

yet the mikeys of this world still wont be happy with answers given and will still "demand" evidence etc etc, even though its all around them.

like you i was born and bred in london, have lived here all my life and all ive witnessed is the gradual decline of standards and loss of identity in my city and other parts of the country and the country as a whole thanks to the flood of people and their breeding habits from all the planets third world pits.

i remember things i used to hear as kid about the detrimental effect these people would have and how thier numbers would grow....and they were spot on.

factor in the eussr and its a double whammy...
//It’s nothing to do with sour grapes Mikey. If Mr Khan had been a Conservative my feelings would be exactly the same.//

Mine too - and as I said earlier, had he been standing under a Conservative banner the outcome would have been the same. Labour can claim no credit here.
I think if he had been stood under the Monster Raving Loonies banner or whatever he would have got in.
Ladybirder, he would.
sandyRoe

/// The Celts, Romans, Jutes, Ango-Saxons, and Norman's, came and did us no harm ///

But we managed back in the 40s to keep the Nazi doctoring from our shores, which would (and I think most would agree) would have done us harm.

So taking into consideration what acts of savagery have been committed under the name of Islam, would it not also be wise to keep Islam from our shores?
But thinking about perhaps if mikey had been around at the time, he would have also thought it 'racist' to treat the Germans in such a way?
Sadiq Khan personally arranged that the swearing in ceremony be held at Southwark Cathedral in preference to the normal City Hall venue.
http://www.breitbart.com/london/2016/05/08/londons-new-muslim-mayor-planned-cathedral-swearing-in-ceremony-in-break-with-city-hall-tradition/
He had arranged months in advance that Southwalk Cathedral would be the venue if he was elected.
http://www.breitbart.com/london/2016/05/08/londons-new-muslim-mayor-planned-cathedral-swearing-in-ceremony-in-break-with-city-hall-tradition/

61 to 70 of 70rss feed

First Previous 1 2 3 4

Do you know the answer?

How This Country Is Slowly But Surely Being Destroyed

Answer Question >>