ChatterBank1 min ago
Pfizer-Blocks Use Of Execution Drugs
I suppose they could go back to the electric chair, but have never understood why the lethal injection seem to be so complicated.
From what I have seen/heard, they use three, one after the other in intervals, but sometimes that dosent always work, and it can take a long time to die, some in terrible pain, (no sympathy from me).
So why cant they just give them an overdoes of anaesthetic that you are given before an operation, or a big shot of heroin?
http:// www.dai lymail. co.uk/n ews/art icle-35 90101/P fizer-b locks-u se-exec ution-d rugs-me aning-N O-FDA-a pproved -medica tions-u sed-let hal-inj ections .html
From what I have seen/heard, they use three, one after the other in intervals, but sometimes that dosent always work, and it can take a long time to die, some in terrible pain, (no sympathy from me).
So why cant they just give them an overdoes of anaesthetic that you are given before an operation, or a big shot of heroin?
http://
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by trt. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.Why not the drug that vets use to put dogs and other animals to sleep?
Seriously , I am 100% opposed to the death penalty but if they MUST use it , I can never understand why the USA does not just ask for volunteers to form firing squads.
Hell, there would be so many wanting to do it they would have to draw lots to see who got to 'pull the trigger'. You could auction places in the squads, highest bid wins the right to legally kill a human. Bet someone would pay a $million or more.
Seriously , I am 100% opposed to the death penalty but if they MUST use it , I can never understand why the USA does not just ask for volunteers to form firing squads.
Hell, there would be so many wanting to do it they would have to draw lots to see who got to 'pull the trigger'. You could auction places in the squads, highest bid wins the right to legally kill a human. Bet someone would pay a $million or more.
^^ The point is that if something goes wrong the drug manufacturer stands a chance of being sued for damages. The US government will not accept responsibility if for example the execution goes wrong and the convict ends up with permanent brain damage rather than being killed outright. That could mean the drug maker being sued for hundreds of millions of $ in damages.
-- answer removed --
## Why not the drug that vets use to put dogs and other animals to sleep? ##
Thats another good way Eddie, it only took a few minutes for my old dog to pass away, no pain, just dozed off.
Why cant the US Government employ their own science/chemist people to make the drug, they wouldn't need many, and just a small lab.
Thats another good way Eddie, it only took a few minutes for my old dog to pass away, no pain, just dozed off.
Why cant the US Government employ their own science/chemist people to make the drug, they wouldn't need many, and just a small lab.
-- answer removed --
Some years ago Michael Portillo did a documentary about capital punishment and found there was a painless execution involving nitrogen. They tried it on a feeding pig and pumped the gas to the area where the pig was feeding and the pig collapsed. They stopped the gas so there wasn't enough to kill it and it got bag to its feet and carried on feeding which proved it did not associate anything harmful with feeding.
The use of nitrogen is similar to experiments folk might have seen on TV where oxygen levels in a chamber are reduced and nitrogen levels go up, folk cannot do simple tasks such as put on an oxygen mask and they feel euphoric so they don't really care.
The use of nitrogen is similar to experiments folk might have seen on TV where oxygen levels in a chamber are reduced and nitrogen levels go up, folk cannot do simple tasks such as put on an oxygen mask and they feel euphoric so they don't really care.
I am not a supporter of capital punishment, and never will be.
But considering America has millions of people who delight in possessing guns, why don't they use a firing squad, instead of botching these legalised killings with drugs, that may not work ?
After all, it shouldn't be difficult to find enough volunteers, should it ?
But considering America has millions of people who delight in possessing guns, why don't they use a firing squad, instead of botching these legalised killings with drugs, that may not work ?
After all, it shouldn't be difficult to find enough volunteers, should it ?
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.