I Am Supposed To To What I Am Told
Body & Soul0 min ago
Perhaps The Bremaniacs Should Listen To The Voice Of Their Leader
32 Answers
http://
"Martin Schulz was forced to intervene, warning members that "one major quality of democracy is that you listen to those even if you don't share their opinion"
unless of course you dont like the results of a democratic vote !!!
"Martin Schulz was forced to intervene, warning members that "one major quality of democracy is that you listen to those even if you don't share their opinion"
unless of course you dont like the results of a democratic vote !!!
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by bazwillrun. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
So, Gromit, the sceanrio is this:
We have voted to leave. We have invoke Article 50 (because the Euromaniacs, quite rightly, will not talk to us about the terms we continue with after we leave until then). Some new terms are negotiated. A referendum is held:
"Do you accept these new terms?"
If "Yes", fine. The "decree absolute" is granted and we leave.
If "No" er...er...?
The idea is ridiculous. The terms of our withdrawal were not a conditional part of the question. Voters knew there would be a fundamental change in our relationship with the EU should we leave. That's why so many voted to do so - they do not like the current terms and Mr Cameron's best efforts failed to gain any reforms to them whilst we remained. And I will ask again, apart from the result (and many on the losing side being p'eed off) what has changed since Friday?
We have voted to leave. We have invoke Article 50 (because the Euromaniacs, quite rightly, will not talk to us about the terms we continue with after we leave until then). Some new terms are negotiated. A referendum is held:
"Do you accept these new terms?"
If "Yes", fine. The "decree absolute" is granted and we leave.
If "No" er...er...?
The idea is ridiculous. The terms of our withdrawal were not a conditional part of the question. Voters knew there would be a fundamental change in our relationship with the EU should we leave. That's why so many voted to do so - they do not like the current terms and Mr Cameron's best efforts failed to gain any reforms to them whilst we remained. And I will ask again, apart from the result (and many on the losing side being p'eed off) what has changed since Friday?
doesn't matter judge, once article 50 is invoked we are out full stop after 2 years regardless of any deal done. Frankly I'd just stop paying and tell them to scrub round it. We import 10 times what we export. Game over. Politicians may whine but business will be more pragmatic. The twists are already making the right noises, so are the firesides.
Mrs Murkhell says we cant expect trade deals without accepting "free movement". She is getting worried about where all her invited guests are to go when we say sorry borders closed. Perhaps that was always the intention, wave them in and wave them on.........to Britain. Now she's get a free movement methinks.
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.