Trump And His "wall"

[mikey4444]

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/video_and_audio/headlines/36863008

I especially like the daft woman in fancy dress !

[Old_Geezer]

You planning on showing examples of Johnson's bull and lies gulliver, or are none still yet to be found ?

The trouble with negotiating positions is that they have to be seen as feasible or folk simply write the claimer off as a fruitcake, someone who can't reasonably be negotiated with.

[ToraToraTora]

yep Trump in the White house Hilary in jail! sorry just had to pinch myself there!

[ToraToraTora]

"You planning on showing examples of Johnson's bull and lies gulliver, or are none still yet to be found ? " - he's probably still banging on about what was said about the weekly subs I expect.

[-Talbot-]

But we could see Trump as the 45th President of the USA. Theres the difference.



A change of tune I see.

I'm no Trump fan but I can't help noticing that because it is difficult to find anything good to say about Clinton you focus on decrying Trump.

Unless you can in fact wax lyrical about Clinton?

[gulliver1]

It aint very difficult to upset the Knuckle dragger's of the RWN party on this site , is it.

[mikey4444]

Gulliver...not sure what RWN party means ?

[tamborine]

Not as daft as your dress today

http://tinyurl.com/jva8qyk

[anneasquith]

Is that Boris ?

[ToraToraTora]

just asking for evidence, gulliver, you make these wild accusations with no back up evidence. If I did that the LWN on here would soon be on my case.

[mikey4444]

I wish people please would use English on AB !

[gulliver1]

Mikey 10/13 , ask ttt

[ummmm]

Right Wing Nutters?

[ToraToraTora]

still no evidence gulliver?

[-Talbot-]

My post @ 09:44 Fri 22nd Jul 2016 looks easy to understand.

Anyone like to reply?

[ToraToraTora]

mikey will have to answer that one talbot, I haven't decried Trump.

[Old_Geezer]

Clinton is more "meh". Nothing much to discuss; unless one is keen of decrying private use of work e-mails, maybe; and who hasn't done that ?

[ichkeria]

Yes the "using private email server" charge was a bit desperate, and smacks of either a witch hunt or desperation for want of finding anything else ...

[ToraToraTora]

fromthe Guardian, no less:
"State department and intelligence officials have identified 2,093 email chains from Clinton’s server as containing classified information. Twenty-two were deemed so highly classified that they were withheld from release to the public. Clinton contends that none of the messages was marked classified at the time.
Advertisement

But former US attorney Joseph DiGenova is blunt: “I don’t think there’s any question Mrs Clinton and her staff broke the law. She maintained a server in her private home in Chappaqua, New York, and conducted government business. This clearly was beyond gross negligence.

“When she set up the server, the intent was to avoid accountability. There is no other intent required. The notion this is not a violation of the law is ludicrous. If she and her staff get a pass, there will be hell to pay in the intelligence community.”

sounds serious to me.

[anotheoldgit]

Why is Thump's 'wall' any different from those erected or proposed to be erected all over the world?

/// http://www.economist.com/blogs/graphicdetail/2016/01/daily-chart-5 ///

[retrocop]

A typical fishing exercise by the ethnic reporter.A gent tells her it is a play on words and means the immigration service will be better funded and more rigourous approach to policing the border etc etc (words to that effect)
That wasn't the answer she was looking for so went back and put words in the gents mouth. "The wall is going to be a physical wall, how will he build that?"
The reporter was as dumb as the lady who decided they should be shot so I gave this up as nonsense.