Quizzes & Puzzles14 mins ago
Once Again We Witness The Inequality Of The Sexes, When It Comes To British Justice.
10 Answers
http://
/// But although he was locked away for seven years, his older sister - who initially claimed she did not see "anything morally wrong" with supplying "recreational" drugs to friends - got 12 months jail suspended for 18 months. She was also ordered to complete 80 hours of unpaid
work. ///
/// But although he was locked away for seven years, his older sister - who initially claimed she did not see "anything morally wrong" with supplying "recreational" drugs to friends - got 12 months jail suspended for 18 months. She was also ordered to complete 80 hours of unpaid
work. ///
Answers
1 to 10 of 10
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by anotheoldgit. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
I don't think this is inequality of the sexes.
If you read the link, it is clear that the brother was the main instigator of the crime, and he confessed to possession with intent to supply.
The sister played a minor role compared to his, and he view on drugs is inadvisable, but not a criminal offence.
As I read it, the sentences are commensurate with the offences committed - gender is not relevant in the slightest.
If you read the link, it is clear that the brother was the main instigator of the crime, and he confessed to possession with intent to supply.
The sister played a minor role compared to his, and he view on drugs is inadvisable, but not a criminal offence.
As I read it, the sentences are commensurate with the offences committed - gender is not relevant in the slightest.
-- answer removed --
AOG - ///// At Minshull Street Crown Court, Joel and Poppy pleaded to supplying cocaine. ///
if I am reading this correct, they both pleaded guilty to supplying cocaine, so surely they should have received a similar sentence? //
From your link, it reads to me that the brother was the prime mover in this operation, and also the one who was caught in possession of large amounts of drugs, and he pleaded guilty to possession with intent to supply.
I refer to my earlier post - I don't believe gender was a factor in the sentencing.
if I am reading this correct, they both pleaded guilty to supplying cocaine, so surely they should have received a similar sentence? //
From your link, it reads to me that the brother was the prime mover in this operation, and also the one who was caught in possession of large amounts of drugs, and he pleaded guilty to possession with intent to supply.
I refer to my earlier post - I don't believe gender was a factor in the sentencing.
The Courts will have had the full evidence, we only see a snippet in the article.
//As well as a cocaine charge, Joel also pleaded guilty to possessing 2030 MDMA tablets worth £6,090 and 606g of cannabis worth £8,480 after the drugs were found hidden in a bucket inside his wardrobe during a different police search.//
There's no doubt she has got off relatively lightly but because of her lesser part in this I imagine rather than any other notion.
//As well as a cocaine charge, Joel also pleaded guilty to possessing 2030 MDMA tablets worth £6,090 and 606g of cannabis worth £8,480 after the drugs were found hidden in a bucket inside his wardrobe during a different police search.//
There's no doubt she has got off relatively lightly but because of her lesser part in this I imagine rather than any other notion.
1 to 10 of 10
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.