Food & Drink0 min ago
Was Hillary Buying Off The F B I ... ?
14 Answers
Sequence of events ...
March 2015 ... Hillary deletes the subpoenaed emails.
July 2015 ... the FBI opens an investigation into the emails.
Terry McCauliffe runs a political action committee.
Hillary Clinton raises big sums of money for the committee.
September 2015 ... The committee donates big sums of money to the State Senate campaign of Jill McCabe.
Jill McCabe's husband is the FBI deputy director who is heading up the email investigation into Hillary Clinton.
The FBI guy and his staff decide that the woman who is funnelling money to his wife's State Senate campaign ... does not need to be charged! Funny, that!
Criminal corruption, on a scale
Details in the Daily Mail, apparently.
March 2015 ... Hillary deletes the subpoenaed emails.
July 2015 ... the FBI opens an investigation into the emails.
Terry McCauliffe runs a political action committee.
Hillary Clinton raises big sums of money for the committee.
September 2015 ... The committee donates big sums of money to the State Senate campaign of Jill McCabe.
Jill McCabe's husband is the FBI deputy director who is heading up the email investigation into Hillary Clinton.
The FBI guy and his staff decide that the woman who is funnelling money to his wife's State Senate campaign ... does not need to be charged! Funny, that!
Criminal corruption, on a scale
Details in the Daily Mail, apparently.
Answers
1 to 14 of 14
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by joggerjayne. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
The hacks arent giving us all the facts
( hey unintentional rhyme )
they found the emails undeleted on s/o's computer who was being indicted for sexting. completely different unconnected investigation so should be unusable in the Hillary context
Comey the FBI guy then goes public about 650 000 emails
and later erm seeks a search warrant for them
( hey ! you mean erm NOT the other way round ? )
whic is granted
and today I caught a stub from Trump " and when the director of the FBI rang me up...." ..... really ? Comey is outta a job if he did that - isnt he ?
( hey unintentional rhyme )
they found the emails undeleted on s/o's computer who was being indicted for sexting. completely different unconnected investigation so should be unusable in the Hillary context
Comey the FBI guy then goes public about 650 000 emails
and later erm seeks a search warrant for them
( hey ! you mean erm NOT the other way round ? )
whic is granted
and today I caught a stub from Trump " and when the director of the FBI rang me up...." ..... really ? Comey is outta a job if he did that - isnt he ?
I cannot decide if people are stupid, or just pretending to be stupid.
There are not 650,000 Clinton emails, there are 650,000 Anthony Weiner emails. They were seized during a separate investigation.
Within his Weiner's emails are his (or his wife's) correspondence with Hillary. Those number "more than a thousand". The FBI have already investigated Hillary's emails, so it is highly likely they already have these emails. The FBI are just seeing Weiner's side of a conversation that they already know about.
So the facts are:
1. There are not 650,000 Clinton emails.
2. The FBI will have already seen them.
3. The contents would not be a breach of national security.
4. No illegality involved.
There are not 650,000 Clinton emails, there are 650,000 Anthony Weiner emails. They were seized during a separate investigation.
Within his Weiner's emails are his (or his wife's) correspondence with Hillary. Those number "more than a thousand". The FBI have already investigated Hillary's emails, so it is highly likely they already have these emails. The FBI are just seeing Weiner's side of a conversation that they already know about.
So the facts are:
1. There are not 650,000 Clinton emails.
2. The FBI will have already seen them.
3. The contents would not be a breach of national security.
4. No illegality involved.
The FBI have already said that Hilary is not guilty, over he emails.
I repeat....there is foul play at work here !
But it doesn't seem to have damaged the Democratic campaign too much, at least not yet ::
http://
I know some people will say that Polls can't be taken for granted these days, but Hilary has consistently been in the lead. in this Poll of Polls.
I repeat....there is foul play at work here !
But it doesn't seem to have damaged the Democratic campaign too much, at least not yet ::
http://
I know some people will say that Polls can't be taken for granted these days, but Hilary has consistently been in the lead. in this Poll of Polls.
Gromit
The implication if there is one for Clinton presumably therefore is that somehow Weiner might have been a party to some classified information that came from the Clinton side but had not previously been picked up?
As you indicate, that seems most unlikely.
In any case, a typical email exchange as it resides on someone's laptop will
typically consist of a long trail of text from each party.
The implication if there is one for Clinton presumably therefore is that somehow Weiner might have been a party to some classified information that came from the Clinton side but had not previously been picked up?
As you indicate, that seems most unlikely.
In any case, a typical email exchange as it resides on someone's laptop will
typically consist of a long trail of text from each party.
1 to 14 of 14
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.