Tonight is Children In Need, on the face of it an incredible occasion raising millions every year. But - what exactly is happening with the vast millions each year (£37.1m in 2015) as the problems they aim to tackle are still apparently as bad as ever? Is it just that the charities and initiatives they aim to support simply need billions, not millions to effect real change? Is it that they support too many charities and therefore the slice of the pie allocated to each is not enough? Yes we see images of individual stories where you think "Wow" that child's life is now so much better - well done children in need and pat on the back if you donated.
I read that the majority of charities are in almost every sense - a "business" in their own right. The head's of these charities and senior members draw massive salaries, Sir Nick Young Red Cross CEO £184,000 for example. Save the Children CEO Justin Forsyth - £163,000 is another - perhaps this is the sceptic in me, I am sure they work tirelessly for their £15 grand a month wage, but these are already wealthy people....
I also have issue with the BBC asking us to give our money for disadvantaged children while their top executives and former presenters have done ghastly things to children and then attempted to cover it up. I have given hundreds in the past but this year I might give the whole thing a miss
Friday afternoon rant over - I will probably admit to being narrow minded later but hey ho...!
Are the presenters still paid their usual enormous fees to appear? I recall reading that the 'celebrities' who appear on versions of The Chase, Pointless etc are paid far more than they could get for their charities. It all reminds me of There's A Hole In My Bucket for some obscure reason!