AOG....there is no evidence that Jo was killed by a terrorist.
Mair was an unhinged lone wolf, who refused to give any evidence before or during his trial.
He was subsequently found out to have ultra-right sympathies and had joined the usual rag-bag of far-right organisations in the past.
I note that prosecutors said Mair was motivated by hate and his crimes were "nothing less than acts of terrorism". But Mair wasn't charged and convicted under anti-terrorist legislation, primarily because there was no indication that he acted under orders from any organisation.
Its worth reading the Judges comments at the end of the trial. He also refused Mair's request to make a post-verdict statement, a wise move on the Judges part as far as I am concerned. We shouldn't let someone "grandstand" when they have refused to defend themselves during the trial, or, indeed, take part in the trial in any way
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-38076755
This is also worth reading ::::
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-38071894
An out and out nutter.