Unfortunately it came from my local news broadcast but it seems 'anomalies' occurred in the counting and the 'battleground' states need investigating ....wouldn't it be a hoot if the result was overturned !!
There is nothing remotely democratic about the person who polled 2 million less than votes than the other candidate winning the Election. Otherwise Ed Milliband would now be in Number Ten, quite wrongly.
Trump was the minority candidate, as we all suspected, right from the start.
As I put on another thread, that yo uchose to ignore:
So when the way elections work is in you favour e.g. UKIP 4m votes for 1 seat you all all for it, when it delivers something you dont like then you bang on like this.
You cant have it both ways so make your mind up what it should be.
YMB....I have dismissed previous comparisons to UKIP in the past couple of days. And your comments regards maps show you know nothing of the geography and demographics of the USA.
Clinton got more votes....that is the bottom line. The only reason that Trump will be in the White House in January is by the distortion brought about by the Electoral College.