News1 min ago
Accident Compensation
59 Answers
Earlier this year I was involved in a cycling accident for which I was at fault. Two girls were walking and I collided into one of them. She badly twisted her ankle and was unable to work for 12 weeks, she stated she has a job in retail and standing has been her issue.
The girl is suing me for £4000 in damages through the small claims court, that's £3000 for loss of earnings and £1000 for her personal injuries.
I have taken legal advice and I have been advised that she will need to produce full evidence of her loss of earnings and of her injuries. Though providing she can produce the evidence, it is likely that I will be sued and ordered to pay the girl compensation for the full amount.
As I didn’t have any cycle insurance, I will have to find the money to pay her myself, though I’m advised that a court should allow me to pay in installments, this will still be difficult for me financially.
As I was at fault, I accept that the girl has every right to be compensated for the earnings she has lost, though it feels rather harsh of her to be also suing me an additional £1000 in personal injuries for a sprained ankle. As I now know where I stand on the legal side, I’d Just like to know your honest opinions, I’m not just expecting everyone to see my side of things. Do you think this seems harsh on me or do you feel that she is justified in suing me for her injury on top of her loss of earnings? Would you have done the same?
The girl is suing me for £4000 in damages through the small claims court, that's £3000 for loss of earnings and £1000 for her personal injuries.
I have taken legal advice and I have been advised that she will need to produce full evidence of her loss of earnings and of her injuries. Though providing she can produce the evidence, it is likely that I will be sued and ordered to pay the girl compensation for the full amount.
As I didn’t have any cycle insurance, I will have to find the money to pay her myself, though I’m advised that a court should allow me to pay in installments, this will still be difficult for me financially.
As I was at fault, I accept that the girl has every right to be compensated for the earnings she has lost, though it feels rather harsh of her to be also suing me an additional £1000 in personal injuries for a sprained ankle. As I now know where I stand on the legal side, I’d Just like to know your honest opinions, I’m not just expecting everyone to see my side of things. Do you think this seems harsh on me or do you feel that she is justified in suing me for her injury on top of her loss of earnings? Would you have done the same?
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by gb60mail. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.when I was working, the loss of earnings figure alone would have been around 9,000 and that was 9 years ago so quite a bit more now. As i live alone, there would have also been expenses for such things as care of my dogs and anything else that I was unable to do for myself. If i were you I would pay up, shut up, be thankful to have got off so lightly and GET SOME THIRD PARTY INSURANCE.
Woofgang, whilst I appreciate you taking the time to answer, your last reply is just plain rude. I have been very honest about my situation which some others do appreciate. I do now have 3rd party insurance it's just that I didn't at the time which I now realize was very unwise. I'can't pay up as you suggest as I don't have £4000 in a lump sum. That is why the girl is suing me through the court. I don't mean to be rude, but YOU are the one who needs to shut up.