News0 min ago
What Evil People
41 Answers
I would call them animals but that would be degrading to animals.
How many of this sort are now in Europe?
http:// www.dai lymail. co.uk/n ews/art icle-40 54312/J ihadi-p arents- teach-y oung-da ughters -suicid e-bombe rs-kiss -goodby e-start ling-fo otage-s hortly- seven-y ear-old -walked -Damasc us-poli ce-stat ion-blo wn-remo te-deto nator.h tml
How many of this sort are now in Europe?
http://
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by youngmafbog. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.divebuddy - //Andy, I expect you missed this bit.....//Well, given that the girl was definitely going to blow up (or be blown up I expect), yes, a good outcome. //
No, I didn't miss it - it still doesn't explain how or why the death of a child in this horrific incident is a 'good outcome' - if I am 'missing' something else, do feel free to point it out.
No, I didn't miss it - it still doesn't explain how or why the death of a child in this horrific incident is a 'good outcome' - if I am 'missing' something else, do feel free to point it out.
-- answer removed --
-- answer removed --
-- answer removed --
divebuddy - //Bomber walks into police station and blows themselves up. Only fatality is the bomber.
Given that the bomber was going to die anyway, the issue is how many others will die. If no others die, that's a good outcome.
That's not hard to grasp, surely. //
If the bomber was an adult jihadist who made the decision to die as a martyr for his or her faith, then that is one thing. I would never say it was a 'good outcome' for anyone to die an unnatural death.
But this was not an adult jihadist, this was a child, and children by definition are innocents, and that is why her death cannot be a 'good outcome'.
I think we will have to have to differ on this - you seem to think that any good bomber is a dead bomber. I would say that a dead child is not a good thing - ever.
Given that the bomber was going to die anyway, the issue is how many others will die. If no others die, that's a good outcome.
That's not hard to grasp, surely. //
If the bomber was an adult jihadist who made the decision to die as a martyr for his or her faith, then that is one thing. I would never say it was a 'good outcome' for anyone to die an unnatural death.
But this was not an adult jihadist, this was a child, and children by definition are innocents, and that is why her death cannot be a 'good outcome'.
I think we will have to have to differ on this - you seem to think that any good bomber is a dead bomber. I would say that a dead child is not a good thing - ever.
// I took TWR's post to mean that the parents are probably claiming benefits from the Turkish government. //
Perhaps I missed that they are living in Turkey? It reads as though they are living in Syria, near to the police station they bombed.
// A short time later, the seven-year-old is thought to have walked into a police station in Syria's capital, Damascus, before being killed in an explosion. //
Perhaps I missed that they are living in Turkey? It reads as though they are living in Syria, near to the police station they bombed.
// A short time later, the seven-year-old is thought to have walked into a police station in Syria's capital, Damascus, before being killed in an explosion. //