New Judge - //If there was no Carnival today and somebody came along with a proposal to hold an event that would involve closing many streets in central London for three days and that they expected a million people to crown into the area permission would simply be denied. The Carnival has become unwieldy and unsuitable for the area in which it is held. The organisers should hire a suitable venue for their product and charge its audience a suitable sum to cover the cleaning and policing costs. //
I am surprised - you are not normally known for stating the obvious, especially when it is irrelevant.
Exactly the same argument applies to Glastonbury Festival, which has grown from a simple field-based weekend to a site the size of the city of Bath - and similarly has grown over decades, and similarly, it would not be able to be sprung fully formed on the local populace.
The difference is, as villagers will tell you - it is not the three days of the festival, it is the two months either side of it when their rural roads are perpetually blocked by massive articulated lorries bringing and then taking away again the city-sized infrastructure that goes with the event.
The point is - both events are now here, and they exists because of what, and where they are, and my point remains - you could equally move Glastonbury to the 02 - but it wouldn't be Glastonbury any more, and not simply because of the relocation.