I Thought It Was Only The Children Who Were At Risk, But It Now Seems That It Is Also The Women, Shall We Then Take Them In As Well?

[anotheoldgit]

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2017/feb/12/dunkirk-child-refugees-risk-sexual-violence

[Islay]

Zacs I think JD and AOG are afraid of the watering down of the fine British blood!!
Yes we should allow the abuse women in.

[mikey4444]

Well said Islay !

[anotheoldgit]

Islay

Thanks for the compliment, yes British blood is certainly very fine.

Is it just those particular women and those particular children that we should let in, or every women and children that may be in danger throughout the world?

If is to be only those in France, why are you so uncaring about those throughout the world, and don't the lives of men mean anything to you?

[anotheoldgit]

mikey4444

/// Well said Islay ! ///

Suck, suck, then he complains of Trump sucking up to Putin.

But then I suppose some have to grovel for support.

[Islay]

//don't the lives of men mean anything to you? //

Not if their the likes of you!

[mikey4444]

AOG...that is daft !

Its your thread and your link we are debating....stick to your own topic at least !

[anotheoldgit]

Islay

Charming, you seem such a horrible woman.

Now don't let me stop you from crawling out of the question that I set you.

[anotheoldgit]

mikey4444

/// Its your thread and your link we are debating....stick to your own topic at least ! ///

Even if the likes of you and Islay don't eh?

[Islay]

Oh but AOG that is the response that you throw around all the time so I thought it was de rigueur to use it.
As for your question, the women that have presented themselves as in danger and are immigrants should be allowed in.

[naomi24]

Thinking back to New Year’s Eve in Cologne, if we want to keep the women safe we could let them in – but not the men.

[Islay]

And you seem such a horrible man but heh hoh!!

[sp1814]

I've not heard an explanation as to why the refugees cannot be settled in France.

Also, if the women (as well as the children) are in danger from traffickers - the full force of the French judicial system should be brought down on the traffickers. At this point, it's not the responsibility of the UK.

[B00]

"describes how a 14-year-old from Morocco appeared to have been..."

Morocco?? There's troubles in Morocco, enough for minors to flee the country?

[anotheoldgit]

Islay

The different being, although you seem a horrible women, I would have no wish to see your life in danger.

[Baldric]

///These people are in France. If they are in danger, and I don't doubt that they are, then France should be doing its bit.
But Britain should be doing its bit as well///

Why, we're not part of thr stupid Schengen Agreement which allowed them in to France in the first place, it is nothing to do with us.

[webbo3]

the simple solution has to be keep the men seperated from the women and children at the camp, and out of their huge budget the eu can police it.


Dave.

[anotheoldgit]

Islay

/// As for your question, the women that have presented themselves as in danger and are immigrants should be allowed
in. ///

It's official, this person would allow into the UK, unlimited numbers of the World's endangered persons, providing they were women and children.

[anotheoldgit]

webbo3

If the women and men were kept separate, who would provide those crying newborns, those which are put before our eyes, so as to tug on our heart strings?

[anotheoldgit]

Baldric

Quite agree, it should be the sole responsibility of those countries that signed up to the Schengen Agreement.