News2 mins ago
Would You Pay £18,500 For These Pictures Of Evil?
32 Answers
Although interesting to see I really would not want to own them.
Surely a museum is the best place for them to prevent their misuse by some misguided individual?
http:// www.dai lymail. co.uk/n ews/art icle-42 70820/N ever-se en-shot s-Hitle r-revea led-pho to-albu m.html
Surely a museum is the best place for them to prevent their misuse by some misguided individual?
http://
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by youngmafbog. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.An immeasurable amount of history has been burned over the centuries. What this mindless vandalism has cost the world in terms of knowledge doesn’t bear thinking about.
https:/ /en.wik ipedia. org/wik i/List_ of_book -burnin g_incid ents
https:/
samjenko, no; I assumed burning was just one possible way of getting rid of them.
I don't think photos that have already been reproduced are in the same category as, say, the buildings of Palmyra. Any documentary value they have comes from what they show, not from the actual materials used in printing them by Boots of Berlin. I'm not fussed what happens to them; as I've already mentioned, there are lots more photos and films of Hitler around already.
I don't think photos that have already been reproduced are in the same category as, say, the buildings of Palmyra. Any documentary value they have comes from what they show, not from the actual materials used in printing them by Boots of Berlin. I'm not fussed what happens to them; as I've already mentioned, there are lots more photos and films of Hitler around already.
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.