Quizzes & Puzzles1 min ago
He's Back Again !
Nigel Farage: 'I'd probably stand in Thanet by-election'
http://
Its looking like the Tories won the Thanet South by-election by fiddling with the election expenses, so we could see Our Nigel back again
....8th time lucky perhaps !
http://
Its looking like the Tories won the Thanet South by-election by fiddling with the election expenses, so we could see Our Nigel back again
....8th time lucky perhaps !
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by mikey4444. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
samjenko
// You should do what I suspect Gromit did, and quietly withdraw. //
And I suggest you watch the programme again as you have clearly forgot it or did not understand it.
Farage quickly dismissed the Cardwell allegation. He said he didn't believe a dossier even existed. In any case, if a UKIP member passed on information to the Tories, then that isn't fraud, and would not cause the election to be re-run. A re-run would only occur due to the battle bus expenses fraud, and it was that scenario that Farage was answering the question about standing again.
// You should do what I suspect Gromit did, and quietly withdraw. //
And I suggest you watch the programme again as you have clearly forgot it or did not understand it.
Farage quickly dismissed the Cardwell allegation. He said he didn't believe a dossier even existed. In any case, if a UKIP member passed on information to the Tories, then that isn't fraud, and would not cause the election to be re-run. A re-run would only occur due to the battle bus expenses fraud, and it was that scenario that Farage was answering the question about standing again.
Gromit......The in-fighting between Carswell and Farage is one of the more amusing and entertaining aspects of UKIP's fast demise into farce .....may it continue for a while yet.
By the way, has anybody heard anything from Nuttall recently ? Since he lost the Stoke By-Election, he has been strangely silent.
By the way, has anybody heard anything from Nuttall recently ? Since he lost the Stoke By-Election, he has been strangely silent.
Nothing new seems like Labour are not squeaky clean when it comes to fraud.
http://
And talk about the expense scandle:
/// There is an overwhelming likelihood that it is indeed statistically significant that only Labour MPs have been found guilty as a result of the expenses investigation. Labour members of the House of Commons need to face up to the uncomfortable truth. The outcome of the Telegraph investigation strongly suggests they are much more likely to lie, cheat and steal than members of other parties. Now that the expenses scandal has drawn to a close, they urgently need to ask themselves why that should be. ///
http://
http://
And talk about the expense scandle:
/// There is an overwhelming likelihood that it is indeed statistically significant that only Labour MPs have been found guilty as a result of the expenses investigation. Labour members of the House of Commons need to face up to the uncomfortable truth. The outcome of the Telegraph investigation strongly suggests they are much more likely to lie, cheat and steal than members of other parties. Now that the expenses scandal has drawn to a close, they urgently need to ask themselves why that should be. ///
http://
MP Craig Mackinlay quizzed over election expenses
http://
http://
Well, if the allegations are true - and there is obviously enough stuff for them to be investigated seriously - then the seat should, in all honesty, be awarded to the, near in count, 2nd. i.e. Nigel, without going to the expense of another election (which could be undermined by more subtle fraud).
I'd have given this answer no matter what party came second, by the way.
I'd have given this answer no matter what party came second, by the way.
