Film, Media & TV0 min ago
Isle Of Wight Mp Steps Down After 'gay Danger Remark'
http:// www.bbc .co.uk/ news/uk -englan d-hamps hire-39 749203
An old dinosaur that should have stepped down years ago, IMHO.
Good riddance !
An old dinosaur that should have stepped down years ago, IMHO.
Good riddance !
Answers
Sqad But the procreation argument doesn't make sense, unless gay people are biologically incapable of producing children. And let's face facts - closeted gay people have been producing kids for millennia. So - homosexualit y in itself cannot possibly be dangerous to society. What would be accurate is this: "Homosexuali ty is dangerous to society, when...
13:46 Sat 29th Apr 2017
This for the Best Answer:
Togo
/// Mikey has been asking someone to point out the dangers of homosexual behaviour and our collective attitudes towards it in terms of future effects on society. We are assured that it has always been widespread( no pun intended) without causing social decay, although in most civilisations it has been taboo. We are now at the stage, where with the influence of our Liberal advisors, we are to treat it as a norm and not to discriminate. I don't think we did unless it was a blatant flaunting of such behaviour, although the "Gay community", particularly in the arts have always practised positive discrimination of their own, without you must admit any particular reaction from the hetero world. Now we reach the stage where it is to be considered an alternative lifestyle and taught to prepubescent minors as normal behaviour with no social stigma or uneasiness. What if that is to pass? What is the next "moral" crusade for the somewhat non conformist, shout loud and long, brigades. There are types out there who have a fascination with all sorts of other lifeforms, is that then to be added to our agenda of accepted behaviour? Thin end of the wedge perhaps? You tell me or better still Mikey. The "love that dare not speak its name" has fast become the one that can't shut up....................I think my lasagne is done. ///
Togo
/// Mikey has been asking someone to point out the dangers of homosexual behaviour and our collective attitudes towards it in terms of future effects on society. We are assured that it has always been widespread( no pun intended) without causing social decay, although in most civilisations it has been taboo. We are now at the stage, where with the influence of our Liberal advisors, we are to treat it as a norm and not to discriminate. I don't think we did unless it was a blatant flaunting of such behaviour, although the "Gay community", particularly in the arts have always practised positive discrimination of their own, without you must admit any particular reaction from the hetero world. Now we reach the stage where it is to be considered an alternative lifestyle and taught to prepubescent minors as normal behaviour with no social stigma or uneasiness. What if that is to pass? What is the next "moral" crusade for the somewhat non conformist, shout loud and long, brigades. There are types out there who have a fascination with all sorts of other lifeforms, is that then to be added to our agenda of accepted behaviour? Thin end of the wedge perhaps? You tell me or better still Mikey. The "love that dare not speak its name" has fast become the one that can't shut up....................I think my lasagne is done. ///
London Pride - a once year event.
Football - on telly every week, several times a week.
Football is also in the papers seven days a week.
I have no interest in football, but I appreciate it appeals to others. I simply don't read about it.
Anyone who has issues with the Pride march should try the same as what I do.
It works.
Best of luck.
Football - on telly every week, several times a week.
Football is also in the papers seven days a week.
I have no interest in football, but I appreciate it appeals to others. I simply don't read about it.
Anyone who has issues with the Pride march should try the same as what I do.
It works.
Best of luck.
Islay - I have checked my post and I find nothing nasty in it. You are the provocative one - and I am not the first to find you so. Discussion closed.
Who is saying I am a Tory voter, by the way? I did say that I might have to vote Tory in this election - but I haven't voted Tory for over 20 years. I vote with the issues.
Who is saying I am a Tory voter, by the way? I did say that I might have to vote Tory in this election - but I haven't voted Tory for over 20 years. I vote with the issues.
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.