Is The Hypocrisy?

[sp1814]

I thought that under-age girls could not be described as 'child prostitutes' or 'ten prostitutes'. In reality, they're exploited children.

If this is the case, then aren't these men groomers?

And would Daily Mail readers be more sympathic to her had the men been...browner?

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4559646/Oakland-teen-prostitute-cop-sex-scandal-wins-1million.html#comments

[naomi24]

PeterPedant, good evening, my little stalker. Lovely to see you. :o)

[naomi24]

sp, There is no comparison between this and Rochdale, et al. I get the impression that you would like to make some sort of connection, but it simply isn’t there. Give it up.

[sp1814]

naomi24

I respectfully disagree.

divebuddy - I don't. Please refer to my previous posts. It's not something I do. I assume you must be new to the News section, but I assure you, I react to posts about race, but my own questions are very varied.

Perhaps you're mistaking me for someone else? Happens all the time on the News section, so no big deal really.

I understand.

[naomi24]

sp, give it a rest.

[sp1814]

naomi24

Thanks, but why not let others have their say and argue against me, so I can put my point back to them?

I get the feeling that you're assuming the role of an unofficial 'AB Invigilator', advising others of when they should stop discussing something.

I thank you for the advice, but if it's okay with you - I'll carry on as long as I want to.

But again - thanks. Really.

[sp1814]

divebuddy

Please check my posts.

They're all there in my history.

I've just checked myself. I don't think your point stands.

Do you?

[douglas9401]

OMG

I can't believe you just

typed that


Can you?

[naomi24]

sp, fine by me. You harp on incessantly about race and gay issues, even when neither is actually an issue, as in this case - but carry on if you must. My advice was kindly meant.

[sp1814]

divebuddy/naomi24

The thing is - I don't.

All you need to do is click on my name, and then look at My Qs and Answered.

If you claimed that I'm always banging on about Trump and the Daily Mail, then I would say "You've got me".

However, the evidence in front of me doesn't support your position. It may be the impression you've got - but the impression isn't accurate.

Perhaps you might have gotten this idea because I respond to AOG's threads, which frequently concern race issues?

Is that where this comes from?

[naomi24]

sp, //The thing is - I don't. //

Yes ... you do.

I'm off to talk about something else.

[sp1814]

naomi24.

Have a nice night.

[vetuste_ennemi]

//I get the feeling that you're assuming the role of an unofficial 'AB Invigilator'//

I remember (back in the eighties) an anti-Maggie commentator describing Screaming Lord Sutch's party as "saner than the Official Loonies".

Well, if you'd seen some of the recent "official" invigilation, you might think an unofficial version could be an improvement.

[Sqad]

I define any girl who looks like that photograph, who uses her body for sexual monetary gain, even though she is 16 years old as either a *** or a prostitute.
Take your choice.

[Sqad]

^^^sl@g"

[NoMercy]

I agree, Sad.

When you see some of the attire that Kim Kardashian and Mikey Cyrus and the like pose in these days, is it any wonder that young girls' appearances are so trashy and indecent.

[Zacs-Master]

I think you mean 'some' young girls NoM. Most that I come into contact with dress stylishly and modestly.