Crosswords0 min ago
Smartest Man In World Says ...
64 Answers
... "Vote Labour"
As an antidote to Lord Sugar endorsing the Tories, I give you Stephen Hawking (I know who I give more credence to).
He has reservations about JC (not policies but presentation), but still endorses Labour :
http:// www.ind ependen t.co.uk /news/s cience/ stephen -hawkin g-jerem y-corby n-labou r-there sa-may- conserv atives- endorse ment-ge neral-e lection -a77740 16.html ?cmpid= faceboo k-post
As an antidote to Lord Sugar endorsing the Tories, I give you Stephen Hawking (I know who I give more credence to).
He has reservations about JC (not policies but presentation), but still endorses Labour :
http://
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by sunny-dave. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.Yes indeed Naomi, I am. I've explained why twice already but I'll say this just one more time :
"If I could make a difference with a Labour vote I surely would - but the FPTP system means my vote is effectively wasted.
My seat is a safe Tory one - after a squalid deal with UKIP the sitting Tory MP will get around 60% of the vote. Any vote for an opposing party is (under our daft electoral system) just so much waste paper.
Thus I can indulge myself in voting for the best local person and encourage an effective and personable Green candidate, rather than the lacklustre Labour chap"
"If I could make a difference with a Labour vote I surely would - but the FPTP system means my vote is effectively wasted.
My seat is a safe Tory one - after a squalid deal with UKIP the sitting Tory MP will get around 60% of the vote. Any vote for an opposing party is (under our daft electoral system) just so much waste paper.
Thus I can indulge myself in voting for the best local person and encourage an effective and personable Green candidate, rather than the lacklustre Labour chap"
I bet JC is already spending Hawkings tax bill.
http:// www.the richest .com/ce lebnetw orth/ce lebrity -busine ss/rich est-sci entist/ stephen -hawkin g-net-w orth/
http://
Yes Jim, it's a balancing act weighing up all the pros and cons to aspects of each parties structure and manifesto.
There are always aspects to a favoured party's manifesto that won't be to one's liking but it depends on how strong you feel about a particular issue.
Some are bothered about policing cuts less than fox hunting and so forth. Others simply don't get past an individual like Corbyn less so than the Labour policies.
All sorts of factors to consider really, harder for some than others...
There are always aspects to a favoured party's manifesto that won't be to one's liking but it depends on how strong you feel about a particular issue.
Some are bothered about policing cuts less than fox hunting and so forth. Others simply don't get past an individual like Corbyn less so than the Labour policies.
All sorts of factors to consider really, harder for some than others...