News9 mins ago
Corbyn Shows Signs Of Losing The Plot
86 Answers
Just when he had things going his way, it seems Jezza can't resist proposing some fantasy based ideas of toppling the Gov't:
http:// www.tel egraph. co.uk/n ews/201 7/06/11 /jeremy -corbyn -vows-v ote-que ens-spe ech-top ple-the resa-ma y/
http://
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by Zacs-Master. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.Well put it this way: if it does get defeated, then the symbolism is clear: no Tory minority government, another election in August, and actually that would be the fault of a few Tory rebels or a failure to get the DUP onside.
Incidentally, in that case, wouldn't you be glad May was going anyway? She's aimed (and failed) to get a mandate to lead rather more important negotiations than with the DUP. In that case why should we trust her anyway to lead those negotiations?
Incidentally, in that case, wouldn't you be glad May was going anyway? She's aimed (and failed) to get a mandate to lead rather more important negotiations than with the DUP. In that case why should we trust her anyway to lead those negotiations?
..// I don't think that anybody has ever voted down the Queens Speech // Danny K
The Queen (V) opened the new Parliament on 24 Aug 1841. (Melbourne prime minister) On the same day, Conservative MP John Stuart-Wortley proposed in the House of Commons an amendment to the House's address in answer to the Queen's Speech, which claimed that the government no longer possessed the confidence of Parliament.... (motion carried)
so that is one. ( for slow readers: that is one queens speech that was defeated in the House of Commons)( in contrast to Danny K saying there wasnt one)
why do I even bother to rise to these challenges ?
ZM classically doesnt rise above an excellent Stanley Unwin impression - combunctious manytimes wibbly wobbly woo static.
But ZM does it much better than me - plus plus obvious combuliance
o god you mean that ZMz original post wasnt a Stanley Unwin impression - it was a serious comment ?
combunctious sombulia ! manytimes infused !
In that case welcome back to AB on a 'normal' Sunday afternoon
[if any of you monkeys want to know the connection between ZM and Stanley Unwin I am sure the fella can swing you the gen himself]
The Queen (V) opened the new Parliament on 24 Aug 1841. (Melbourne prime minister) On the same day, Conservative MP John Stuart-Wortley proposed in the House of Commons an amendment to the House's address in answer to the Queen's Speech, which claimed that the government no longer possessed the confidence of Parliament.... (motion carried)
so that is one. ( for slow readers: that is one queens speech that was defeated in the House of Commons)( in contrast to Danny K saying there wasnt one)
why do I even bother to rise to these challenges ?
ZM classically doesnt rise above an excellent Stanley Unwin impression - combunctious manytimes wibbly wobbly woo static.
But ZM does it much better than me - plus plus obvious combuliance
o god you mean that ZMz original post wasnt a Stanley Unwin impression - it was a serious comment ?
combunctious sombulia ! manytimes infused !
In that case welcome back to AB on a 'normal' Sunday afternoon
[if any of you monkeys want to know the connection between ZM and Stanley Unwin I am sure the fella can swing you the gen himself]
// Sorry PP I wasn't around in 1841// Danny K
the problem dear danny is that history always seems to have happened before you were born..... [o is that a cue for my fave one liners about history?]
1.those who do not learn from history are condemned to repeat it
2. history is always repeated - once as comedy and secondly as tragedy
3. zair eez only warn lesson from history an zat eez there are no lessons from history ( Maurois or Mauriac or s/o else)
the problem dear danny is that history always seems to have happened before you were born..... [o is that a cue for my fave one liners about history?]
1.those who do not learn from history are condemned to repeat it
2. history is always repeated - once as comedy and secondly as tragedy
3. zair eez only warn lesson from history an zat eez there are no lessons from history ( Maurois or Mauriac or s/o else)
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.