ChatterBank2 mins ago
Terrorist Attack Or Hatred Attack?
71 Answers
Why are most news outlets saying that last nights attack was a 'terrorist attack'!
Thats not the way I see it, it was some deluded idiot, with his own agenda, who felt the need to attack people who follow Islam, surely thats not a terrorist attack.
Has it been given that title to try and appease muslims?
Thats not the way I see it, it was some deluded idiot, with his own agenda, who felt the need to attack people who follow Islam, surely thats not a terrorist attack.
Has it been given that title to try and appease muslims?
Answers
I don't think it was a terrorist attack, it was a lone nutter. I suppose the authorities are trying to portray this as a terrorist attack because the modus operandi is the same as the the Westminster Bridge attack. But they are entirely different. There is no ideology behind this attack, it is pure and simple hatred and bigotry, not ideologic religous...
23:09 Mon 19th Jun 2017
Why are we even bothering arguing over semantics?
Evil, deranged killer.
Whether he's a terrorist or a lone wolf psycho, the effect is the same - death, injury and fear.
I honestly think that whilst people are in hospital with life threatening injuring - focussing on how the attacker is labelled is like rearranging deckchairs on the Titanic.
Evil, deranged killer.
Whether he's a terrorist or a lone wolf psycho, the effect is the same - death, injury and fear.
I honestly think that whilst people are in hospital with life threatening injuring - focussing on how the attacker is labelled is like rearranging deckchairs on the Titanic.
yes !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
they havent even assessed him yet, maybe he was mentally ill ? you know the same as the " muslim " knife attacker in sweden , the " muslim" axe attacker in germany, the " muslim " suicide bomber in..............
i think he was just like me...completely ***d off with these islamic scumbags getting away with " blue f******g murder "
what or who are the egenda pushing this ???????????????
i cannot buy into this , the worlds going mad and i cannot for the life of me think why this is all coming to the fore now in the last few years,
something is happening ?
10 years ago i did not think about muslims or islam....
it connot continue !!
they havent even assessed him yet, maybe he was mentally ill ? you know the same as the " muslim " knife attacker in sweden , the " muslim" axe attacker in germany, the " muslim " suicide bomber in..............
i think he was just like me...completely ***d off with these islamic scumbags getting away with " blue f******g murder "
what or who are the egenda pushing this ???????????????
i cannot buy into this , the worlds going mad and i cannot for the life of me think why this is all coming to the fore now in the last few years,
something is happening ?
10 years ago i did not think about muslims or islam....
it connot continue !!
I am somewhat filled with foreboding. This may be seen by some as 'pour encourager les autres'. 49 years ago Enoch Powell quoted from the Aeneid, Book VI. When Aeneas visited the Sybil to ask what she foretold she replied, "...bella, horrida bella"
"Et Thybrim multo spumantem sanguine cerno"
(Wars, terrible wars, and I seem to see the Tiber foaming with much blood)
"Et Thybrim multo spumantem sanguine cerno"
(Wars, terrible wars, and I seem to see the Tiber foaming with much blood)
I don't think it was a terrorist attack, it was a lone nutter.
I suppose the authorities are trying to portray this as a terrorist attack because the modus operandi is the same as the the Westminster Bridge attack.
But they are entirely different. There is no ideology behind this attack, it is pure and simple hatred and bigotry, not ideologic religous fanaticism.
There is no attempt to appease muslims. They are desperately trying to portray a fairly minor attack by a
Numpty as the same as a IS or al qaeda planned atrocity, and it was anything but.
I suppose the authorities are trying to portray this as a terrorist attack because the modus operandi is the same as the the Westminster Bridge attack.
But they are entirely different. There is no ideology behind this attack, it is pure and simple hatred and bigotry, not ideologic religous fanaticism.
There is no attempt to appease muslims. They are desperately trying to portray a fairly minor attack by a
Numpty as the same as a IS or al qaeda planned atrocity, and it was anything but.
Most dictionary definitions of 'terrorism' suggest a political motive or the idea that some aim is being pursued. In many of these cases, be they so-called jihadist or racist, it is very hard to say for certain what the motive or aim is beyond blind hatred. However when the authorities say they are treating it as a 'terrorist' incident it doesn't mean they are merely slapping a label on it: it means that they are looking for potential links to terrorist organisations, in this case previously unknown perhaps, who may have such aims and motives.
Hopefully they will conclude: 'lone nutcase'
Hopefully they will conclude: 'lone nutcase'
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.