Donate SIGN UP

Grand Parents Arrange Gbh On Their Grandson......

Avatar Image
ToraToraTora | 08:20 Thu 29th Jun 2017 | News
53 Answers
http://www.bbc.com/news/uk-england-nottinghamshire-40420511
Yep it's another belter from the religion of peace.
Gravatar

Answers

21 to 40 of 53rss feed

First Previous 1 2 3 Next Last

Avatar Image
No child should be subjected to mutilation for religious reasons. When they reached the age of 18 they could decide if they wanted this procedure done. I doubt if many would.
09:19 Thu 29th Jun 2017
I'll make it simpler for you , why would the mother wait 18 months to report the incident to authorities ? ( that's a question mark )
Like I said....maybe she was scared.
fathers consent should be sufficient
[perhaps he didnt]
and the grandparents just said to each other
lets just do it !

///His mother originally contacted social services, then contacted Nottinghamshire Police on 24 November 2014///

Doesn't state when she contacted Social Services, and it is only a maximum of 16 months anyway
//No child should be subjected to mutilation for religious reasons. //

No child should be subjected to mutilation for ANY reason.
I think parents who allow their children to have pierced ears counts as mutilation, especially when they're toddlers.
We all know why Nottinghamshire plod wont do anything. Too afraid of the minority 'community' that it seems can act with impunity.

Pretty sure if my mother had done that to my kids being an atheist she would have been up before the beak.
Why are they afraid?
So having started on Anne, you are starting on me.

Stop being so obtuse.
16 months 18 months big difference , not !!!
Jeez...Mr Sensitive!

I was asking why the police would be afraid as I don't know why they would.
Question Author
yes you do ummm, you are being deliberately annoying.
lols @ TTT thinking ummmm is being a right Saddam Hussein ... you couldn't make it up.
///yes you do ummm, you are being deliberately annoying.///

Pot.....Kettle.... LoL

Apparently, there are health benefits provided by circumcision. But I would never have willingly allowed a child of mine to undego such a procedure without proper medical attendance and a valid medical reason.
It is barbaric and should have no place in modern society unless the individual concerned is old enough to make an informed decision and give their consent.
Considering the Muslim population of our prisons that suggests to me that the police are not afraid.

And TTT...me annoying, you gotta be kidding, take a look in the mirror!
The law is clear,
// 2(7) of the Children Act 1989 does not enable a parent to arrange circumcision without the consent of the other” //

So a crime has been committed, and there should be a punishment.

People seem to be queuing up to condemn this as barbaric and cruel facet of the Islamic faith, but are conveniently not commenting on the fact that people of the Jewish faith have been practicing this mutalation in the UK for centuries.
But this isn't about a Jewish family breaking the law, Gromit.

Start your own anti-Jewish rant thread.
Would Jewish grand parents do it behind the parents back and send the baby back in a bloodied nappy. I very much doubt it.
What,, Jewish grand parents would not, but Muslim grand parents would. !!!!!!
as I see it..religion in such a case is not germane..Grandparents acted without parental consent...

21 to 40 of 53rss feed

First Previous 1 2 3 Next Last

Do you know the answer?

Grand Parents Arrange Gbh On Their Grandson......

Answer Question >>

Related Questions

Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.