Well, top grades at A-Level have gone up for the first time in six years. This year 26% of entrants got A* or A grades. Up to the mid- 1980s this figure was consistent at a little under 10%. Then it rose inexorably and consistently every year, peaking at about 28% in 2006. So, around a three fold increase in top grades awarded 20 years when there had been no appreciable increase in at least the previous 30. Pupils getting brighter? Teaching getting better? Or grades being devalued? To answer that you do not need to look very far. Things like this (from the International Business Times) help considerably:
http://www.ibtimes.co.uk/level-students-face-unexpected-grades-after-thresholds-lowered-1634810
I’ve snipped a bit out to help you even further:
------
Top A-Level and GCSE results will be easier to achieve this year after thresholds were lowered to avoid a slump in grades. The exam regulator Ofqual lowered grade boundaries to "protect" students from tougher standards brought in under reforms designed to drive up standards.
The softer stance means similar proportions of A-Level pupils opening their results on Thursday (17 August) will have passed and achieved top grades compared to last year with one quarter attaining A or A*.
Critics argue the intervention flies in the face of reforms unveiled by former education secretary Michael Gove but defending her decision, Sally Collier, the head of exam regulator Ofqual, said the new policy meant lower thresholds were necessary.
Sally Collier, chief regulator of Ofqual, told the SundayTimes: "I want the message to be that students have done fantas¬tically well. All our kids are brilliant.”
-----
Ms Collier is mistaken. All our “kids” are not brilliant. Some of them are but most are not. That’s the idea of exams, to sort the wheat from the chaff. Providing all with prizes does the students no good at all and gives them false expectations. They will soon discover this when they enter the real world - one that is not stuffed with academics spouting claptrap and giving a quarter of them top marks.
“There was a program on TV last night about the Norton motorbike factory. They are having to turn down orders because they can't get enough skilled production workers.”
He might get a few more (skilled workers, that is) if companies (including his) operated a proper apprentice scheme as they did up to about 1980 (strangely, about the time top grades at A-Level began their rise). Instead they want a constant supply of people ready-trained (at somebody else’s expense, natch) who can walk in and do the skilled tasks they require. They should see training of staff as part of their overheads and reflect it in their prices (so their customers pay for it). It’s all part of weaning themselves off the idea that they simply ship in migrants from elsewhere to meet their staffing needs.