News1 min ago
Another Resignation By Twitter?
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by -Talbot-. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
A spokesman for Naz Shah has commented that her re-tweeting that the victims of the racist Rochdale rapists should be quiet for the sake of diversity as a “…genuine accident…”.
Given that this is the same Naz Shah who blamed her hatred of Jews last year on “ignorance”, I think I prefer the more likely explanation that rather than tweeting by accident and being ignorant about jews, that she is, quite simply, a liar.
Given that this is the same Naz Shah who blamed her hatred of Jews last year on “ignorance”, I think I prefer the more likely explanation that rather than tweeting by accident and being ignorant about jews, that she is, quite simply, a liar.
Well, firstly, because the president hardly ever retweets anything. If you look at his Twitter feed it is almost entirely stuff he has written (or dictated or whatever) himself. Plus his twitter feed seems to be an instrumental part of how the White House is run, because he's regularly announced hiring and firing decisions before anyone else knew about them through Twitter.
This is just some random MP who has retweeted something which some joker has written on twitter... I really can't see what's to get het up about.
This is just some random MP who has retweeted something which some joker has written on twitter... I really can't see what's to get het up about.
Krom, Im not sure why you are making excuses for her but I will stick with What I believe ... a vile nasty opinion from a vile nasty person.
You don't accidently like a tweet and then accidentally retweet. If you were dumb enough to do that it would take a second to rectify not 8 plus minutes after you had been told you have fallen for the old parody account trick.
You don't accidently like a tweet and then accidentally retweet. If you were dumb enough to do that it would take a second to rectify not 8 plus minutes after you had been told you have fallen for the old parody account trick.
Well it's a parody account of Owen Jones, so it's just spoofing the disproportionately militant rhetoric and backwards priorities which sometimes makes its way into political arguments on the internet (in particular, the kind of stuff he sometimes comes out with).
It's not a sophisticated or particularly side-splitting joke, but it doesn't warrant an attack of the vapors.
It's not a sophisticated or particularly side-splitting joke, but it doesn't warrant an attack of the vapors.
/// Given that this is the same Naz Shah who blamed her hatred of Jews last year on “ignorance”, I think I prefer the more likely explanation that rather than tweeting by accident and being ignorant about jews, that she is, quite simply, a liar. ///
Plus the fact that she does not seem to know what she is doing, the woman should be sacked.
Plus the fact that she does not seem to know what she is doing, the woman should be sacked.
There seems to be something inherently disingenuous within the Labour party and among its supporters. Last week we had Jeremy Corbyn emphatically denying that gangs of Pakistani Muslims were responsible for grooming young white girls – that was ignored by Corbyn supporters here, just as this is being ignored by most of them - and now this we are expected to dismiss this as a ‘joke’. No apology. It isn’t.
I'll just go ahead and assume that is aimed at me...
erm yes a silly tweet written by an irrelevant satire account. Not exactly unreasonable to insist that it's a joke.
I have not been keeping up with news over the past couple of weeks, I didn't know Corbyn had denied the grooming gangs. If he did, he's wrong and he should be challenged over it.
erm yes a silly tweet written by an irrelevant satire account. Not exactly unreasonable to insist that it's a joke.
I have not been keeping up with news over the past couple of weeks, I didn't know Corbyn had denied the grooming gangs. If he did, he's wrong and he should be challenged over it.
"...a silly tweet written by an irrelevant satire account"
Agreed.
But the point is, given who it is and her track record, I'm willing to bet my left arm she wasn't aware it was satire, and only removed it when somebody alerted her to it.
You do not 'accidentally' like and re-tweet something like this.
Agreed.
But the point is, given who it is and her track record, I'm willing to bet my left arm she wasn't aware it was satire, and only removed it when somebody alerted her to it.
You do not 'accidentally' like and re-tweet something like this.
i can guess, as usual with the left they avoid any questions on here where the article is clearly right and pointing out the misdemeanours of the left.
Krom, I must say you are the exception and you put up a valiant argument but, I'm afraid in my opinion you are wrong. This lady has history and is not a nice person, and the silence from JC is deafening.
Krom, I must say you are the exception and you put up a valiant argument but, I'm afraid in my opinion you are wrong. This lady has history and is not a nice person, and the silence from JC is deafening.
Latest Posts
Quizzes & Puzzles3 mins ago
Listener 4848 Return By Dysart
Crosswords8 mins ago
Crosswords8 mins ago
Crosswords10 mins ago