Road rules3 mins ago
Do We Need To Be Taught What Brexit Means?
49 Answers
http:// www.bbc .co.uk/ news/uk -politi cs-4114 0564
I can't believe the arrogance of this eejit.
I can't believe the arrogance of this eejit.
Answers
No, Gulliver. What should have happened is: 1. On 24th June 2016, Article 50 should have been triggered, with a statement saying that we are no longer part of the European Union. 2. An announcement made inviting those who want to trade with us to come and talk. 3. A declaration made that we would only pay for what we were absolutely, fully committed to, up to the...
07:04 Mon 04th Sep 2017
I just spotted this on the BBC website.
Has the EU given a definitive answer to the legal position on wether we HAVE to pay and a DETAILED and SIGNED OFF accounts of the amount he wants?
It always comes back to the one thing really. Legality. Legality of the demand and legality of the amount.
If I have read the reports correctly he hasn't even given an amount he wants (speculation not withstanding). He is making the UK say how much just so he can say we agree we owe.
HE should have the balls to say you owe xxx because of yyy provable by zzz.
Then and only then would the UK be able to question what they want.
Has the EU given a definitive answer to the legal position on wether we HAVE to pay and a DETAILED and SIGNED OFF accounts of the amount he wants?
It always comes back to the one thing really. Legality. Legality of the demand and legality of the amount.
If I have read the reports correctly he hasn't even given an amount he wants (speculation not withstanding). He is making the UK say how much just so he can say we agree we owe.
HE should have the balls to say you owe xxx because of yyy provable by zzz.
Then and only then would the UK be able to question what they want.
No. Like cassa I've been advocating preparing for no deal for a long time. It is completely beyond me that young people can see the sort of attitude at the top of the EU and still want to be ruled by those people.
Having said that, on my recent flight home from Italy, I had to explain to very many of my fellow passengers what the 'Shengen' area was and why we had to queue separately as 'Non-Schengen'. One bloke didn't believe me and queued elsewhere for ages before being sent to join us!! We were actually a bit faster than the 'Schengen' lot. :)
Having said that, on my recent flight home from Italy, I had to explain to very many of my fellow passengers what the 'Shengen' area was and why we had to queue separately as 'Non-Schengen'. One bloke didn't believe me and queued elsewhere for ages before being sent to join us!! We were actually a bit faster than the 'Schengen' lot. :)
We've already told them to do one:
'Over a three-hour Powerpoint presentation, British officials picked apart the EU claims over liabilities'
https:/ /www.th eguardi an.com/ politic s/2017/ aug/30/ uk-tell s-bruss els-neg otiator s-their -brexit -bill-s ums-do- not-add -up
'Over a three-hour Powerpoint presentation, British officials picked apart the EU claims over liabilities'
https:/
We would have contributed while we were members, their pension scheme now needs to cover liabilities with fewer members.
I'm fine with contributing where we have signed up beforehand, always have been; but not otherwise. Ex-members aren't liable for much. And we won't have signed up to keep paying for things that will no longer be our responsibility and for which we won't benefit.
I'm fine with contributing where we have signed up beforehand, always have been; but not otherwise. Ex-members aren't liable for much. And we won't have signed up to keep paying for things that will no longer be our responsibility and for which we won't benefit.
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.