Quizzes & Puzzles22 mins ago
Uk 'eliminates Measles' For First Time
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by mikey4444. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ."Humans are just really bad at understanding risk assessment, basically"
Jim....you may be right, but the issue with the MMR jab was that people preferred to believe Wakefield, rather than their own GP.
Wakefield is now widely discredited and isn't even a doctor anymore, having been struck off in May 2010, and is now spreading his deeply flawed research in America, where perhaps the population could be described as more credulous than here at home.
Jim....you may be right, but the issue with the MMR jab was that people preferred to believe Wakefield, rather than their own GP.
Wakefield is now widely discredited and isn't even a doctor anymore, having been struck off in May 2010, and is now spreading his deeply flawed research in America, where perhaps the population could be described as more credulous than here at home.
"Jim....you may be right, but the issue with the MMR jab was that people preferred to believe Wakefield, rather than their own GP."
Well yes, but that was (at least partly) because they didn't understand how to assess the risks properly. That and the all-too-common distrust people have in expert opinion. It's a toxic cocktail -- which is ironic, because that's exactly what the MMR jab isn't.
Well yes, but that was (at least partly) because they didn't understand how to assess the risks properly. That and the all-too-common distrust people have in expert opinion. It's a toxic cocktail -- which is ironic, because that's exactly what the MMR jab isn't.
s/o wobndering why it was a killer
https:/ /academ ic.oup. com/aje /articl e/173/1 0/1211/ 184695/ Extreme -Mortal ity-Aft er-Firs t-Intro duction -of
discussion about first measles in the pacific
[including some died in droves and some didnt]
and the classic - measles in the Faroe Islands 1846
http:// www.del taomega .org/do cuments /PanumF aroeIsl ands.pd f
I thought 60% croaked - nothing like 3-5% - mostly under fives the great majority under one
https:/
discussion about first measles in the pacific
[including some died in droves and some didnt]
and the classic - measles in the Faroe Islands 1846
http://
I thought 60% croaked - nothing like 3-5% - mostly under fives the great majority under one
//Whilst we have unfettered and often illegal immigration we will never eliminate any disease.//
um yeah like small pox, plague rabies and ebola - rap on YMF !
( diphtheria, polio)
and in the drives to eliminate polio, vaccination in various patterns was top of the list and second and third
I love these outbreaks of alt-right reason on AB !
um yeah like small pox, plague rabies and ebola - rap on YMF !
( diphtheria, polio)
and in the drives to eliminate polio, vaccination in various patterns was top of the list and second and third
I love these outbreaks of alt-right reason on AB !
diphtheria - jesus was there any last year ?
https:/ /www.go v.uk/go vernmen t/uploa ds/syst em/uplo ads/att achment _data/f ile/609 001/hpr 1317_dp hthr2.p df
yeah six-ish - four cutaneous ( where? - the skin)
96% of the population are vaccinated and the six werent
interesting dynamic system - the naughty bacterium is 'bigger' than the innocent sort and so in a vaccinated population the bigger naughty one trades at a disadvantage - and dies out !
( the toxic bacterium has longer DNA - to code for the toxin geddit? - than the innocent one and so requires more energy to multiply and is at an darwinian disadvantage )
[ sorry cant resist technical comments like this and the ensuing avalanche of:
wot dat den ? what means toxic den ? cant help dair den!
didnt do reading at skool den - and I can see why! Darwin - didnt he invent electricity? wot he doin here den? I blame Crick and What's on? yeah what's on later den ? ]
https:/
yeah six-ish - four cutaneous ( where? - the skin)
96% of the population are vaccinated and the six werent
interesting dynamic system - the naughty bacterium is 'bigger' than the innocent sort and so in a vaccinated population the bigger naughty one trades at a disadvantage - and dies out !
( the toxic bacterium has longer DNA - to code for the toxin geddit? - than the innocent one and so requires more energy to multiply and is at an darwinian disadvantage )
[ sorry cant resist technical comments like this and the ensuing avalanche of:
wot dat den ? what means toxic den ? cant help dair den!
didnt do reading at skool den - and I can see why! Darwin - didnt he invent electricity? wot he doin here den? I blame Crick and What's on? yeah what's on later den ? ]
Jackdaw......I think that you are getting confused........you mean German measles. This is a different disease than measles and the big danger is that of catching it whilst pregnant as it can adversely effect the unborn foetus. That is why they had measles parties ..GERMAN Measles, to catch it as a child to minimise the effect during pregnancy.
I think part of the issue with the MMR jab was the way that the information and the decision was presented. There was definitely a public attitude of "Us big clever people know more than you little ignorant people so we are going to MAKE you do what we think is the right thing" Then Tony Blair wouldn't say what he had decided to do about his own son. It felt like the genuine, if mistaken concerns, of parents were not being respected.
Sqad, in the days before vaccination, yes it used to be thought by some people that it was a good idea to get the childish illnesses over with and some people did hold measles parties and chicken pox parties as well as german measles parties. I never went to one as my mum thought it was a stupid idea.
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.