Why do you take one event and make some tenuous connection to Labour and the left wing? You’d have to be some kind of special stupid to think that these eejits vote a particular way, or are supportive of a particular type of politic.
From what I know of York University, these are probably members of the Young Conservatives (or Young Farmers - which is pretty much the same) - but I won't be heaping 'guilt by association' on the highly respectable Tory Voters on this site ...
Sign of desperation when the attempt to smear Labour is so non existent, that the question is laughable.
These fools are not representative of young people. And not all young people vote Labour.
Labour do have policies that appeal to the you g. Any sensible party will try and appeal to ALL voters and not exclude any particular section.
And now we have the idiotic suggestion that voters can be determined by their appearance. Still, it was from someone who mistook Katie Hopkins TV watching as an eye witness account, so.....
Why is that that even the most tenuous of links to bad behaviour is always pounced on as revealing the "true nature" of Labour voters and yet Conservatives burning money in front of the homeless or bullying their own into suicide or advocating violence or expressing Nazi views are always just shrugged off as "a few bad apples"?
Could it perhaps be that ridiculous charicatures are emotionally satisfying headline-grabbers rather than rigorous ways to understand who votes and why?
They should be made to sit and watch each episode of the excellent and illuminating documentary series "Ambulance". If they have any sense at all, that ought to stop them doing things like this..................... ever again.