ChatterBank0 min ago
Why Does May Agree To Do Tv And Radio Interviews...
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by Gromit. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.What's dishonest about opting not to answer ? Politicians do it all the time, it's one of the skills in a politician's skillset.
And the question is clearly mischievous as either answer just gives opportunity to put her on the spot again. As long as she stops blinking first and making offers to the EU, when it's high time they moved their position instead, and she manages the process, that is about the best one can hope for.
And the question is clearly mischievous as either answer just gives opportunity to put her on the spot again. As long as she stops blinking first and making offers to the EU, when it's high time they moved their position instead, and she manages the process, that is about the best one can hope for.
No I don't, it's what I'd expect. She may not have given any consideration to the hypothetical question. It certainly doesn't do her any favours discussing it since it's not relevant to doing the job. IMO she should supervise the process of the UK team side but let her band of three get on with delivering Brexit for her. Her personal beliefs wouldn't then cause any inconvenience, or crisis of conscience on her part.
I would agree with May not being good on tv, she simply does not have any charisma at all, much like spreadsheet Phil.
However, on this occasion I think she is right to not answer. The question is pointless given the number of variables and no matter which way she went then she would be just digging a hole for herself.
However, on this occasion I think she is right to not answer. The question is pointless given the number of variables and no matter which way she went then she would be just digging a hole for herself.
I don't think she's being unreasonable in not answering the question, but I do wish that politicians weren't so afraid of being honest in general.
If, for example, Theresa May had answered, "I would probably vote remain again but as I see it the people's will was, and still is, to leave the EU and as Prime Minister I see it as my duty to carry out the democratic will of the people", then isn't that what people say her position is anyway? Why not say so?
Oh, and as a logical follow-up to the inevitable question of whether Prime Ministers are meant to do the best thing for the country, rather than blindly follow the people's will, perhaps an answer of, "I thought on balance that Remaining in the EU was the better thing for the country but that's absolutely not the same as saying that Leaving is necessarily a disaster regardless of what we do. We can make it work and that is what I intend to do to the utmost of my ability."
Well, that's how I see her position, anyway, and that's how it's been sold by some on here. I don't know how true that is to her or not but then that's rather the point. Dodging hypothetical questions is reasonable to an extent but even not answering is itself an answer. Politicians shouldn't be so afraid of the truth is all, and I wish that changed, but it's not really May's thing personally.
If, for example, Theresa May had answered, "I would probably vote remain again but as I see it the people's will was, and still is, to leave the EU and as Prime Minister I see it as my duty to carry out the democratic will of the people", then isn't that what people say her position is anyway? Why not say so?
Oh, and as a logical follow-up to the inevitable question of whether Prime Ministers are meant to do the best thing for the country, rather than blindly follow the people's will, perhaps an answer of, "I thought on balance that Remaining in the EU was the better thing for the country but that's absolutely not the same as saying that Leaving is necessarily a disaster regardless of what we do. We can make it work and that is what I intend to do to the utmost of my ability."
Well, that's how I see her position, anyway, and that's how it's been sold by some on here. I don't know how true that is to her or not but then that's rather the point. Dodging hypothetical questions is reasonable to an extent but even not answering is itself an answer. Politicians shouldn't be so afraid of the truth is all, and I wish that changed, but it's not really May's thing personally.
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.