Business & Finance4 mins ago
Does Yanis Varoufakis Have A Point?
...when he says she is being forced to negotiate to negotiate.
http:// www.exp ress.co .uk/new s/uk/86 7945/Br exit-ne ws-UK-T heresa- May-PMQ s-Miche l-Barni er-EU-G reece-m inister -Sky-Ne ws-vide o
http://
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by Khandro. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.It has always seemed to me that Britain made a huge tactical error by sending a senior, elected, minister to negotiate with a ghastly squit (sorry 'bureaucrat') who can just keep waving his checklist and insisting that he has no authority to move beyond it.
We should have kept our elected Government back in London and sent a heavily mandated 'Sir Humphrey' with our own checklist.
When it (very rapidly) became apparent that the talks were inherently stalled, we should have insisted on *both* sides providing Organ Grinders rather than Monkeys and then the talks could have got started for real.
We should have kept our elected Government back in London and sent a heavily mandated 'Sir Humphrey' with our own checklist.
When it (very rapidly) became apparent that the talks were inherently stalled, we should have insisted on *both* sides providing Organ Grinders rather than Monkeys and then the talks could have got started for real.
Having lived for so long in France, we have known the 'tick box' mentality for a long time. It is impossible to negotiate with them, boxes must be ticked in the right order. We have had many hugely frustrating beaurocratic experiences. That's why we have espoused giving our terms for their acceptance or not and just walking away otherwise. We cannot win on this.
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.