Other Sports0 min ago
National Action Charges: Man Accused Of Mp Murder Threat
http://
I am not aware that this has been posted or discussed here on AB, but I may be wrong.
I am not aware that this has been posted or discussed here on AB, but I may be wrong.
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by mikey4444. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
Andy...Not sure what point you trying to make here ?
It is quite normal in Britain, for people to be named when they have been arrested. This case is no different to 1000's of others that happen every day.
Until they have been found guilty, they will continue to have the status of "innocent until proven guilty"
It is quite normal in Britain, for people to be named when they have been arrested. This case is no different to 1000's of others that happen every day.
Until they have been found guilty, they will continue to have the status of "innocent until proven guilty"
By the way, these innocent men, if they are Members of
National Action, are Members of a seriously bad organisation. ::::
https:/
National Action, are Members of a seriously bad organisation. ::::
https:/
\\Until they have been found guilty, they will continue to have the status of "innocent until proven guilty"//
Not so, there have been plenty of rape cases where the mans name has been published before trial only to be proved innocent later and the accuser was telling lies but her name remained anonymous.
Not so, there have been plenty of rape cases where the mans name has been published before trial only to be proved innocent later and the accuser was telling lies but her name remained anonymous.
It would seem that there is one who has not been named.
There does not seem to be much information regarding the threat to the MP, obviously if it proves to be a direct threat, then of course they should feel the whole weight of the law upon them.
But so far it seems that their biggest crimes seem to be that
members and supporters applauded the murder of Jo Cox MP and that the group had carried out a series of small, but confrontational, demonstrations in towns and cities throughout England, one of its most notorious events saw masked members - many of them very young men - gathering outside York Minster to make Hitler salutes.
So how can they be compared to the banned al Muhajiroun network? Who I am sure have got much more threatening plans arranged given half the chance.
/// to all intents and purposes, has organised itself in a similar way to the banned al Muhajiroun network - the extremist Islamist youth movement. ///
There does not seem to be much information regarding the threat to the MP, obviously if it proves to be a direct threat, then of course they should feel the whole weight of the law upon them.
But so far it seems that their biggest crimes seem to be that
members and supporters applauded the murder of Jo Cox MP and that the group had carried out a series of small, but confrontational, demonstrations in towns and cities throughout England, one of its most notorious events saw masked members - many of them very young men - gathering outside York Minster to make Hitler salutes.
So how can they be compared to the banned al Muhajiroun network? Who I am sure have got much more threatening plans arranged given half the chance.
/// to all intents and purposes, has organised itself in a similar way to the banned al Muhajiroun network - the extremist Islamist youth movement. ///
AOG...as usual, you need to re-read the link above.
To help you, this is what it says ::::
"A man arrested as part of an investigation into the far-right group, National Action, has been charged with encouragement to commit murder"
and
"A 22-year-old man, from Lancashire, who cannot be named, has also been charged with the intention of committing acts of terrorism and "threats to kill"."
Finally ::::
"National Action became the first far-right organisation to be banned in the UK in December 2016. It means that being a member of or inviting support for the organisation is a criminal offence carrying a sentence of up to 10 years' imprisonment"
Those are the facts AOG, as they stand at the moment, and that is why they have been arrested and charged.
This thread has nothing to do with "al Muhajiroun network"
To help you, this is what it says ::::
"A man arrested as part of an investigation into the far-right group, National Action, has been charged with encouragement to commit murder"
and
"A 22-year-old man, from Lancashire, who cannot be named, has also been charged with the intention of committing acts of terrorism and "threats to kill"."
Finally ::::
"National Action became the first far-right organisation to be banned in the UK in December 2016. It means that being a member of or inviting support for the organisation is a criminal offence carrying a sentence of up to 10 years' imprisonment"
Those are the facts AOG, as they stand at the moment, and that is why they have been arrested and charged.
This thread has nothing to do with "al Muhajiroun network"
Webbo....I have a certain amount of sympathy with what you said on the issue of rapes cases, and there is an argument that could be made for the accused not be identified until found guilty. I am not saying that it should be so, but that some people could make a case for it.
However, this case has no element of rape, as far as I can see.
However, this case has no element of rape, as far as I can see.
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.