Quizzes & Puzzles1 min ago
Fabricated Evidence Against Rolf?
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by Khandro. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
jno, //It's not unknown for websites to promise things they can't deliver, and it's at least possible Harris wasn't accessing such material, or trying to. //
If the old man wasn't trying to access such material I can't imagine why he'd have been looking at a site promising 'nieces'. I definitely wouldn't give him the benefit of the doubt. Dirty old devil.
If the old man wasn't trying to access such material I can't imagine why he'd have been looking at a site promising 'nieces'. I definitely wouldn't give him the benefit of the doubt. Dirty old devil.
it's possible that he was looking for "ordinary", legal material involving teenagers and expected to find it on such sites. From what I've read, real hard-core material exists on the internet, or the dark web part of it, but is difficult to access unless you belong to arcane file-sharing groups. (This may be wrong; it's not a field I know anything about.) You don't find it on mainstream porn sites like that one appears to be.
##"But the dad of the youngest victim told a court due to her age [8] he would not have let her go to a community centre where she said Harris groped her in Portsmouth in 1969.
There were no press reports of the star visiting the centre [if he had, it would have been surely reported ] and the only other person claiming to recall it was a criminal and liar, the court heard."##
When I lived in Gloucestershire there was a highly profiled case of a young girl who claimed she had been abducted and sexually assaulted, she gave descriptions of the man, and the place, a huge search was carried out several men were detained and questioned, after a period of about a fortnight, she confessed to her parents that she had made up the whole story, presumably to gain attention.
That is why, unlike some people on here, I am very cautious about condemning a man on an uncorroborated testimony, particularly when it comes from an 8 year old.
There were no press reports of the star visiting the centre [if he had, it would have been surely reported ] and the only other person claiming to recall it was a criminal and liar, the court heard."##
When I lived in Gloucestershire there was a highly profiled case of a young girl who claimed she had been abducted and sexually assaulted, she gave descriptions of the man, and the place, a huge search was carried out several men were detained and questioned, after a period of about a fortnight, she confessed to her parents that she had made up the whole story, presumably to gain attention.
That is why, unlike some people on here, I am very cautious about condemning a man on an uncorroborated testimony, particularly when it comes from an 8 year old.
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.