News33 mins ago
Australians Decisively Support Same-Sex Marriage
http:// www.bbc .co.uk/ news/wo rld-aus tralia- 4199234 4
Nice to see that Oz is being dragged into the 21st Century, at last !
Nice to see that Oz is being dragged into the 21st Century, at last !
Answers
No..... Let's not compare it with other things, let's celebrate the fact that Australia has said that it will allow committed same-sex couples to marry. A very good day, indeed.
17:46 Wed 15th Nov 2017
Fairly typical of a number of posts is this:
"Those who are the most disapproving seem to spend a disproportionately large amount of time considering those very acts of which they disapprove."
The thread's about gay marriage, not about gay "relationships" per se, far less gay sex in general. Even the thickest of you should be able to work out that a person can "disapprove" of the first without necessarily disapproving of the the other two? And as I can give most (not all) of you the credit for not being thick, can I ask you to stop conflating my or others' opposition to gay marriage with animus against gays? This habit of yours is illogical and unfair. What's worse it makes you all seem rather nasty.
"Those who are the most disapproving seem to spend a disproportionately large amount of time considering those very acts of which they disapprove."
The thread's about gay marriage, not about gay "relationships" per se, far less gay sex in general. Even the thickest of you should be able to work out that a person can "disapprove" of the first without necessarily disapproving of the the other two? And as I can give most (not all) of you the credit for not being thick, can I ask you to stop conflating my or others' opposition to gay marriage with animus against gays? This habit of yours is illogical and unfair. What's worse it makes you all seem rather nasty.
Opposing someone having the same rights as you do is rather innately hostile, v_e.
//complete dislike for what has never been proved as natural sexual activities.//
Who cares if it's natural or not? If you want to live in a completely "natural" society, you're welcome to go and find one. Most of us prefer flush toilets and rule of law.
//complete dislike for what has never been proved as natural sexual activities.//
Who cares if it's natural or not? If you want to live in a completely "natural" society, you're welcome to go and find one. Most of us prefer flush toilets and rule of law.
I thought my comment "The thread's about gay marriage, not about gay "relationships" per se, far less gay sex in general. Even the thickest of you should be able to work out that a person can "disapprove" of the first without necessarily disapproving of the the other two?" should have made half of Kromo's post and all of Mikey's unnecessary.
If we want, however, to make this an issue of rights ("marriage equality" as one poster put it on a different thread - same topic) then there's a rather more intelligent debate to be had.
You might start out by arguing on identical premises logical and emotional ("denying love between two people" etc.) that incestuous marriage should be legalised. I'd love to hear a logical argument agaisnt that.
If we want, however, to make this an issue of rights ("marriage equality" as one poster put it on a different thread - same topic) then there's a rather more intelligent debate to be had.
You might start out by arguing on identical premises logical and emotional ("denying love between two people" etc.) that incestuous marriage should be legalised. I'd love to hear a logical argument agaisnt that.
//Unfortunately, many gain-sayers cannot divorce s-e-x from their opinions on gay relationships.//
Many is a little better than stupidities like "at the heart of all", I suppose.
I can't claim to speak for anybody but myself, and will do so now.
I am an atheist and have no moral view about any[i sexual preferences, thinking these things to be a given.
I remember the Wolfenden Report as a kid and approved the subsequent decriminalisation of homosexuality.
More recently I approved the Civil Partnership legislation which gave gay couples formal next of kin status.
Now that's what this bigot [i]approves] of.
Now I'll tell what I disapprove of - gay marriage and gay adoption.
I would happily give my reasons for that on a thread where I wasn't insulted by poster who think that accusations of racism or homophobia are dispositive.
Many is a little better than stupidities like "at the heart of all", I suppose.
I can't claim to speak for anybody but myself, and will do so now.
I am an atheist and have no moral view about any[i sexual preferences, thinking these things to be a given.
I remember the Wolfenden Report as a kid and approved the subsequent decriminalisation of homosexuality.
More recently I approved the Civil Partnership legislation which gave gay couples formal next of kin status.
Now that's what this bigot [i]approves] of.
Now I'll tell what I disapprove of - gay marriage and gay adoption.
I would happily give my reasons for that on a thread where I wasn't insulted by poster who think that accusations of racism or homophobia are dispositive.
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.