Quizzes & Puzzles1 min ago
Britain First Deputy Leader Jayda Fransen Is Arrested For Making An Anti-Terrorism Speech.
118 Answers
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by anotheoldgit. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ. //The point is that she said (according to you) that there is "there are no moderate Muslims and that they are all out to get us." //
I thought that was what the Imams were teaching silly me. Best not quote them then, what?
//You believe that there are no such thing as giraffes - they're just cats sitting on each others' shoulders. //
Oh gawd he's picked up another smart arris snipe. We will get it for ever now..........Says he sitting on the shoulders of giants.
I thought that was what the Imams were teaching silly me. Best not quote them then, what?
//You believe that there are no such thing as giraffes - they're just cats sitting on each others' shoulders. //
Oh gawd he's picked up another smart arris snipe. We will get it for ever now..........Says he sitting on the shoulders of giants.
//
//If this is what she has said, then that contravenes provisions in the Race and Religious Hatr4ed Act 2006 - "involving stirring up hatred against persons on racial or religious grounds".//
You don't think you misunderstand my point, SP, I think you're perversely ignoring it.
I 'll try again. The lady's guilty as (about to be) charged? Absolutely agree. Happy?
Now my point: just as bad and far worse is taught in mosques throughout the UK every day of the week. There are fewer NF members than there are SP IQ points; there are two million plus people who regularly attend mosque.
So if I'm right - that is arguable if you choose to argue it, of course - we should be rather more than the hate coming of the mosques than the hate coming out of a speech attended by fifty people.
//If this is what she has said, then that contravenes provisions in the Race and Religious Hatr4ed Act 2006 - "involving stirring up hatred against persons on racial or religious grounds".//
You don't think you misunderstand my point, SP, I think you're perversely ignoring it.
I 'll try again. The lady's guilty as (about to be) charged? Absolutely agree. Happy?
Now my point: just as bad and far worse is taught in mosques throughout the UK every day of the week. There are fewer NF members than there are SP IQ points; there are two million plus people who regularly attend mosque.
So if I'm right - that is arguable if you choose to argue it, of course - we should be rather more than the hate coming of the mosques than the hate coming out of a speech attended by fifty people.
sp1814
/// She is labelling a whole group of people with one intent. ///
Where we wrong to label a whole group of people with one intent during WW2?
Or do we have to wait until another group of Islamic terrorists, crawl out of the woodwork so as to inflict terror and carnage on the streets of Britain.
But even then some will be reluctant to put the blame on Muslims and their religion, much easier to put the blame on one or more 'nutter extremists.' That way no one is offended and everything is hunky-dory until the next time.
/// She is labelling a whole group of people with one intent. ///
Where we wrong to label a whole group of people with one intent during WW2?
Or do we have to wait until another group of Islamic terrorists, crawl out of the woodwork so as to inflict terror and carnage on the streets of Britain.
But even then some will be reluctant to put the blame on Muslims and their religion, much easier to put the blame on one or more 'nutter extremists.' That way no one is offended and everything is hunky-dory until the next time.
sp1814
During WW2 no one could tell a German from a Nazi, and the same applies now, can anyone honestly say that a Muslim is not an extremist.
So it is wise to steer on the side of caution, surely? Even if it means offending a good Muslim who may not possess one nasty thought in his or her head.
Always has been, the majority suffer for the minority.
During WW2 no one could tell a German from a Nazi, and the same applies now, can anyone honestly say that a Muslim is not an extremist.
So it is wise to steer on the side of caution, surely? Even if it means offending a good Muslim who may not possess one nasty thought in his or her head.
Always has been, the majority suffer for the minority.
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.