Quizzes & Puzzles40 mins ago
Going Back To The Moon, Good News?
63 Answers
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by ToraToraTora. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.It won't be that bad, Khandro.....
http:// 1.bp.bl ogspot. com/-bb dlnK-io 4g/UDYx xXt1g0I /AAAAAA AAE5I/0 -I9fZul Btg/s16 00/clan gers-41 5x275.j pg
http://
An interesting aside re the pen/pencil debate.
https:/ /www.sc ientifi cameric an.com/ article /fact-o r-ficti on-nasa -spen/
https:/
I have been thinking about this today. I am of that generation of boys, that were totally taken over by the whole space thing, in the 60's. Those early missions and the moon landings themselves were unbelievably exciting.
Now I am not sure that the eye-wateringly large sums of money couldn't be put to better use, although I am open to being persuaded differently I suppose.
Now I am not sure that the eye-wateringly large sums of money couldn't be put to better use, although I am open to being persuaded differently I suppose.
I support space exploration but I can't see this one getting off the ground.
Nasa is dedicated to robotic exploration not manned flight .So it will mean a total change of direction . This will cost hundreds of billions of $ and have to be approved and funded by Congress, possibility of it being passed ZERO ! The initial study alone is costed at $4.5 Billion
Then it proves nothing, we did it over 50 years ago with basically the same technology. We would be better trying to find a new way to power a rocket or space probe.
It is no more than a Trump vanity project to try to improve his disastrous popularity ratings.
He will be long gone before there is even a basic plan ready.
It will provide nothing we do not already know or can find out cheaper and quicker from automated or robotic landers.
If approved it will drain funding from a far more important project, putting men on Mars. W
Nasa is dedicated to robotic exploration not manned flight .So it will mean a total change of direction . This will cost hundreds of billions of $ and have to be approved and funded by Congress, possibility of it being passed ZERO ! The initial study alone is costed at $4.5 Billion
Then it proves nothing, we did it over 50 years ago with basically the same technology. We would be better trying to find a new way to power a rocket or space probe.
It is no more than a Trump vanity project to try to improve his disastrous popularity ratings.
He will be long gone before there is even a basic plan ready.
It will provide nothing we do not already know or can find out cheaper and quicker from automated or robotic landers.
If approved it will drain funding from a far more important project, putting men on Mars. W
I think one of the most important things we can do is reach out to the stars, and so whatever sum is used (within reason) is money well spent. It ought not be thought of as a budget used for something else because we ought to be budgeting for many things. What are we here for but to go out and find out what we can ? Had we not done so in the past we'd still think dragons existed a few miles up the road at the next village. Meanwhile all our eggs are in the one basket, called Earth, we have to take those first shaky steps off into our local area.
OG; // What are we here for but to go out and find out what we can ? Had we not done so in the past we'd still think dragons existed a few miles up the road at the next village. Meanwhile all our eggs are in the one basket, called Earth, we have to take those first shaky steps off into our local area.//
Have you been smoking pot again?
Have you been smoking pot again?
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.