News2 mins ago
Travelodge V Mud Hut?
74 Answers
http:// www.bbc .co.uk/ news/uk -englan d-devon -423666 85
tricky one! They should leave them alone but now it's been publicised every weirdo on the planet will be doing the same so I can see why the authorities have to act.
tricky one! They should leave them alone but now it's been publicised every weirdo on the planet will be doing the same so I can see why the authorities have to act.
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by ToraToraTora. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.It is indeed a tricky one. I have never stayed in a Travelodge but from the reports I have read a mud hut seems by far the more luxurious option. Just a couple of aged hippies who haven't noticed that this is 2017, not 1967.
Multiple chemical sensitivity? What on earth is that? Maybe Sqad will enlighten us.
Multiple chemical sensitivity? What on earth is that? Maybe Sqad will enlighten us.
Whilst I am usually behind strict enforcement of Planning Regulations when it comes to development in 'open land', I do feel quite sorry for this couple.
They are living off-grid as much as possible and when they move on (whenever that proves to be) they will have left very little detrimental imprint on the landscape, if any.
There are mechanisms whereby individual developments *are* permissible subject to a strict set of rules........this ought to be looked at with that in mind.
They are living off-grid as much as possible and when they move on (whenever that proves to be) they will have left very little detrimental imprint on the landscape, if any.
There are mechanisms whereby individual developments *are* permissible subject to a strict set of rules........this ought to be looked at with that in mind.
Ummmm, every single atom of every piece of matter in the entire universe is composed of Chemicals, you and I are 100% chemicals,composed of the (92?) naturally occurring Elements .
As an Industrial Chemist who got a degree way back in 1973
( when getting a degree was really hard work/study ) I just can not understand the preoccupation with the idea the 'Chemicals' are to be feared when they constitute 100% of all the matter in the entire universe.
As an Industrial Chemist who got a degree way back in 1973
( when getting a degree was really hard work/study ) I just can not understand the preoccupation with the idea the 'Chemicals' are to be feared when they constitute 100% of all the matter in the entire universe.
EDDIE - notwithstanding your need to introduce your past achievements into any particular thread......do you not see how some of the more pernicious chemicals floating around in daily-life could trigger ill-effects in some people......even if you cannot believe in the 'allergic to all chemicals' angle?
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.