Quizzes & Puzzles1 min ago
Trump, Bang On Once More.....
19 Answers
http:// www.ind ependen t.co.uk /news/w orld/am ericas/ us-poli tics/do nald-tr ump-aid -cut-je rusalem -vote-u n-billi ons-dol lars-la test-a8 121116. html
Why should they fund those who vote against the US?
Why should they fund those who vote against the US?
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by ToraToraTora. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.// Why should they fund those who vote against the US?//
where the US marches out - the Russians march in ( for free ) and ask - would you like to be our slaves for a few roubles ?
'whaddam I praddling on abart den ?' Suez 1956 ( see The Crown now on Nedfligz) and wind forward - Tanzania, Syria
and you dont even have to vote against them
when the president of the US of A told the Poles he was gonna ("I'll tell you whaart - I am gonna withdraw 'murican troops and you can pay for it all yourselves with the arms you buy from us") withdraw US troops - how the dumb Polaks clapped and looked over their shoulders to see if the Russians were coming ( back)
'merica is Great and the World is Free !
where the US marches out - the Russians march in ( for free ) and ask - would you like to be our slaves for a few roubles ?
'whaddam I praddling on abart den ?' Suez 1956 ( see The Crown now on Nedfligz) and wind forward - Tanzania, Syria
and you dont even have to vote against them
when the president of the US of A told the Poles he was gonna ("I'll tell you whaart - I am gonna withdraw 'murican troops and you can pay for it all yourselves with the arms you buy from us") withdraw US troops - how the dumb Polaks clapped and looked over their shoulders to see if the Russians were coming ( back)
'merica is Great and the World is Free !
They wouldn't be voting against the US but against the recognition of Jerusalem as Israel's capital. Bullying countries into voting against their conscience by threatening to withhold aid it clearly thinks should be given (or they'd not already being doing so) is pretty low. It won't make the US many friends and most probably turn those who were tolerant of the US, anti. It indicates more than just about anything else so far what standard of president he is.
What will the punishment be for the countries the US doesn't send aid to I wonder? Or are they above censure?
I suspect nothing will come of this.
Hillary Clinton memorably said of Trump during the election campaign that his tactic seemed to be to release rabbits for the press to chase, the effect being that they spent so much time chasing the latest rabbit that his policies got overlooked by them and were never scrutinised.
I suspect this is another rabbit.
I suspect nothing will come of this.
Hillary Clinton memorably said of Trump during the election campaign that his tactic seemed to be to release rabbits for the press to chase, the effect being that they spent so much time chasing the latest rabbit that his policies got overlooked by them and were never scrutinised.
I suspect this is another rabbit.
//was it Pooh Bah who ‘had a little list’?//
defee-er - defee-er ! to the Lord High Executioner !
(allow your voice to go really high on that one)
Pooh-bah had a whole load of titles innit ?
President of the US - Leader of the Free World - Head of NATO Head of SEATO - head of Trump org
just like Mr Trump
defee-er - defee-er ! to the Lord High Executioner !
(allow your voice to go really high on that one)
Pooh-bah had a whole load of titles innit ?
President of the US - Leader of the Free World - Head of NATO Head of SEATO - head of Trump org
just like Mr Trump
// Aid isn’t really about altruism, it is about buying influence.//
What TTT said. If the US is spending money to buy influence, and the supplier isn't delivering, they'd be daft to keep paying - unless of course influence is being delivered in areas other than UN votes, and that will also be withdrawn.
What TTT said. If the US is spending money to buy influence, and the supplier isn't delivering, they'd be daft to keep paying - unless of course influence is being delivered in areas other than UN votes, and that will also be withdrawn.
That is not the sort of "influence" that is desired.
In any case, it isn't only countries in receipt of aid from the US which oppose Trump on this. As I said earlier, are they simply let off these strong-arm tactics? It really IS the politics of the playground as mikey said, by a president who is a growing embarrassment to his country.
In any case, it isn't only countries in receipt of aid from the US which oppose Trump on this. As I said earlier, are they simply let off these strong-arm tactics? It really IS the politics of the playground as mikey said, by a president who is a growing embarrassment to his country.
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.